AI generated models flooding the website

[johnfcooley]

As soon as “rewards” enter the picture it’s always going to be gamed. The $40 card is the problem. It can be used to buy more than filament. People with honest postings should profit. Those full of spam shouldn’t.

I stand firm on MakerWorld not caring. It’s traffic they want. Visibility is priceless. $40 cards are nothing, just an expense, cost of doing business. Your loyalty only counts when you pay money for a printer, filament. Then it only counts as long as you spend the money. Once the orders shipped, doesn’t matter.

I sound cynical. I am. BL isn’t doing anything new. Make no mistake, they don’t care about the AI. They could care less, and it shows. The more you upload the less they care.

Think about this. Users police the content far more than the owner of the site. Users police the content more than the owners of the freaking site. Those that get away with it call others whiners, when they would cry foul loudest if the tap were cut off.

Just get used to it. The gates are open and MW, BL has no desire at all to curb it. It’s not hyperbole.

Wouldn’t be surprised if they don’t add more gift cards to the mix just to encourage it.

[Froggydog10]

At this point when people say, “AI is going to take over the world,” I subconsciously change “world” to “Makerworld”.

[Jorge_Rui]

The Challenge of AI-Generated 3D Models in Today’s Creative Landscape

Over the past few weeks (more than 2), it’s become increasingly clear that AI-generated 3D models are reshaping the creative landscape of platforms like Makerworld, like stated by [MoeStone].
This shift is particularly concerning for a number of reasons.
These AI-driven models are dominating the trending charts. The popularity of these models suggests that users are not only downloading them but also eagerly engaging with and rendering these creations. A closer look reveals that most of these models are purely decorative—vases, animal figurines, and similar items.

This trend points to a shift in user preference: it seems that people are more inclined to engage with these simpler, aesthetic pieces rather than functional or innovative designs. The unfortunate reality is that many of these AI-generated decorative models are quickly flooding the platform and overshadowing the work of creators who invest significant time in brainstorming and perfecting functional models, remember that they are trending, so people like it.

While AI can indeed generate impressive synthesized images (you dont even have to take a photo), creating truly functional models remains a complex task that requires a little deeper understanding of design principles and user needs. However, for decorative items, AI’s capabilities are more than sufficient, making it easy for users to produce basic 3D models based on these images without much design expertise. This ease of production poses a dilemma for creators: AI-generated models are simply more accessible and easier to churn out en masse, making it difficult for those of us who prioritize originality and functionality to keep up. But I can regonize some of them and it nothing new, some have already won awards… I’m not 100% but 99.9%

So, what options are left for creators? Unfortunately, there’s no simple solution. As long as platforms continue to favor the quantity and trending power of AI models, creators who strive for uniqueness may find it challenging to gain visibility and engagement. In the future, we may see fewer creators willing to invest the time and effort in novel designs, as they find themselves overwhelmed by the volume of AI-generated content.

Platforms like Makerworld have implemented tools to financially support creators. In some regions, the compensation may be minimal, but in others, it could offer a meaningful incentive. So, It’s understandable that many are turning to AI as a quick way to monetize content, given these conditions.

In the end, if nothing changes, we risk losing the creative diversity that has traditionally defined 3D model-sharing platforms. As creators, it’s up to us to voice these concerns and advocate for measures that support originality and genuine innovation. But not an easy task.
I think I will end, since this is something that It can take forever…

I will expose this thread to bambu lab people. I hope they can take some action, but i don’t know how…

[h3li0]

Bem dito Jorge

Completely subscribe, even though I do fit into decorative design approach, I would not consider it a simple one as I aim towards originality, which is not easy to achieve in this space, I find it even more challenging as I sure can’t compete with the “factory” that keeps churning out new models daily

[Square3D]

Estou 100% contigo
(I am 100% with you, translated for everyone else)

Well said. Unfortunately we, small creators that are eager to waste our time and create more things, get thrown down. Not speaking for myself since in makerworld i only upload “simple” things that i do in my free time and not complex projects. But some people do work on complex projects and in time will feel this on their back. I feel like the old school community where sharing something that others would perfect even more and share alike is ending or at least coming to an end.

Again, i am thankful for makerworld and the rewards system but in the end, that same reward system is the reason why most of these creators are being driven by greed. They have already defined their way, they have patreons giving them cash in exchange for created images, they have followers in mass numbers, just like you said. Because people look for simplicity and looks and not the real dedicated work.

Again, i love the simplicity of some models but i hate when the product is falsely advertised, especially when it adds costs to those who prints said models expecting at least some quality.

[Froggydog10]

So the gist of this topic is we must not go to the dark side.

[Zammer3D]

Nah the gist is we’re screwed either way unless MW cracks down. They’re just doing decorations for now, but soon they’ll be coming for parametric-esque designs too.

[Square3D]

And here we are

[Docsnyder78]

I have to disappoint you, this is not my account. But I’m fair and wish you much success with this model and your unique idea… You’ve never taken it too seriously with copyrights.

[Square3D]

Glad you shared that (and later edited and deleted). That seems like your model, not mine. But thanks for the concern. Mine has all the sharpness it needs and a different curvature. You, on the other hand, should be more careful with copyrights since a quick check shows that the printables one and yours are the same. Because it’s yours…got it.

Let’s be straight and be over with this. Keep your AI stuff and go on your way. Again, it’s not about the AI images it’s about you not being able to deliver on those images. That’s where i draw the line and if my wife had not wanted to print your model, i would not be here.

You posted this and then edited because… i don’t know, i don’t care:

And my model is this:

i don’t see any resemblance at all. Yours is round on both ends, mine not. yours has less curvature, mine has more. Your has a more hard to print base, mine is slimmer. Mine is the same shape both sides, your is not. Where is the copy here? Go on, you have enough downloads already, be happy.

Do i need to say more? Geez, grow up please. As a German, you should be embarassed and not me.

Have a great night. I know i will

[Docsnyder78]

Yes it is my Account there. And my Upload.
I wish you luck. Maybe it will get as many downloads as the original idea.

[Jorge_Rui]

Can you better explain, and give me a bit more information of whats happening. Please, elaborate on the side of your story.
Thanks

[Square3D]

Hi Rui. Was that for him or for me? Thank you

[Docsnyder78]

Lots of discussions from the same people about the oh-so-hated AI. And if a topic is already closed by the annoyed moderator, you simply open a new one with the same content. And again, and again… If all of this doesn’t work, then consider simply cloning something successful. (Yes, self-built with Fusion, no question) but the idea itself comes from someone else and promises attention. Whether that’s the point then…

[Square3D]

@Docsnyder78

That is not the real model, be serious about that at least

Wish you all a good night and please, don’t be mad. I am small and you are a @MakerWorld big fish. You have nothing to fear as i have right?
Edited: for the record, i don’t want to be You! I don’t want to be called a liar! I don’t want to compete with any of your AI stuff! Just pleased my wife as a good husband should do. Be happy… I know i am

Viele Grüße

[Docsnyder78]

Mir geht’s Bestens
Viele Grüße zurück

[ozarkexpeditions]

Here’s a recommendation for fellow designers who are frustrated by misleading AI-rendered models dominating the trending list. These models get there due to high engagement, often by misleading viewers into thinking they’re something they’re not. Since we haven’t seen site rules evolve to address this (other than the rule against using AI or rendered covers for exclusive models), let’s make our voices heard through our interactions:

• Resist the urge to click on these misleading models just to “verify” how different they look. Each click adds to their engagement stats.
• Avoid commenting to call out the AI use; this also boosts their engagement and can lead to unnecessary frustration. If a model is truly misleading, use the report function instead.

To support genuine talent on the platform:

• Leave positive comments on well-crafted models and highlight the work of emerging designers.
• Like, collect, and engage with these models to help boost their visibility.
• And when you find a model you love, consider downloading it and sharing photos of your print to give the designer additional exposure.

I know I’ve started to comment more on designs I love, and it a fun way to engage with folks.

[wenhan]

I sincerely hope @MakerWorld reward guys like you for real ozark, I’m a huge fan of your work and thank you for the great models. You’ve turned this platform into my favorite site with your awesome designs. AND you are so engaged and commit ed to turn MW into a more pleasant place for genuine talents.

[h3li0]

AI generated content is not subject to copyright, that has been a big topic of discussion especially in the US where it has been attempted many times

That being said I wouldn’t use it myself, but I can see this will start happening more and more given the volume of ai stuff being uploaded daily

And this actually brings an interesting conversation that @MakerWorld should look into, there are many AI generated models being publish under a standard license in the exclusive program, while it’s not really possible to use that specific license

[Johnny_Bit]

@h3li0

there are many AI generated models being publish under a standard license in the exclusive program

And Exclusive model guidelines/agreement explicitly prohibit AI Generated models from joining Exclusive model program.