You first, be the change you want to see in the world
Im not the one making a positive claim..the burden of proof is on OP.
The reality is the facts, the facts are very well known to those who look.
I know the facts, a quick google search will provide to you if you are willing to get educated.Educating you wasn’t the point of the post.
I am seeking to get @BambuLab to make changes to @MakerWorld so that the models that are promoted as food safe are treated with the safety required.
Because it was a shorthand to incredibly well known information.
No print coming out of an FDM is safe without taking the precautions and post print actions I listed above.
While this is an industry, the average user isn’t a business and relies on information imparted to them by those who should be sharing it.
The users are typically hobbyists who are using these models for themselves, a production run of one. They often have no idea of the risks and have no idea they need to look.
Again, where are these people being told they need to look?
Again. They have no idea there is risk.
Again, you still don’t know the main subject of this post as written in the first post and at the top of this reply. You focus on the secondary part of the BL filament that lacks headline level links and warnings. Had you of read the top post, you would have read why the filament was mentioned and it isn’t the main subject.
You are also wrong about my lack of knowledge.
You not understanding the posts point doesn’t mean I don’t know things.
Had you of read what I wrote, you would have seen me make this point!
More points I made.
Interesting that the final product is required to obtain the certification, so none of the models we print can be certified under the BL claims.
For those that believe relevant information should be withheld, I suppose it is. But, personally (and legally) it isn’t my job to be informed of risk with the product of another, it is theirs.
I do not know if you have common sense, but it is clear you didn’t read what was written, do not all great.
You clearly haven’t met people or businesses or politicians or anyone it seems.
Yet you have so many opinions based on a lack of knowledge. All views are welcome, even those who choose to be ill informed or don’t read.
It doesn’t sound like you do.
Fear mongering (as used in this context), implies a statement designed to bring fear to others about something where the actual risk are nonexistent or overblown.
Yet, my whole point is “the real risks are not sufficiently shared with those who have no idea there are risks.
Do you even know what you mean? Based on your lack of understanding and unwillingness to have read what was written, I venture the answer is no.
As for the risks, usage, etc., the Wiki entry has finally been adapted and updated in multiple languages. It looks like it was updated today. I’ll post a link to the new English version:
No major new insights; the content is almost identical to what was already known. Nevertheless, it’s still nice to have a choice of different languages now. A snippet as an example:
In case this refers to me, you should read what was written on the initial post.
No such situation from me.
That said, there is little to help users understand the difference.
And, yet again, for those not reading the actual post, the filament is the secondary point, not the primary one.
Setting aside the topic of contact with food, if the advertising is accurate regarding emissions, that’s definitely a step forward. I see a clear use case for this, particularly in schools and maker-spaces, where students are constantly in the same room.
Even though the price for one roll is a bit high, schools and maker-spaces in particular will surely buy in bulk, and then it will be a perfectly normal price after all.
It doesn’t make that much of a difference when buying in bulk, so I’m actually considering switching to this filament - but only once we have some first-hand feedback from users. I mean, if price isn’t the deciding factor anymore, why not switch?
Actually, I think this development is beneficial and takes 3D printing another step forward. Maybe not as much as a quadruple tool changer, but hey, I’ll take even small achievements - why not? After all, it’s important to see the positive side of things sometimes, not just the negative.
Some people made an error by assuming Bambu would say somethng that Bambu has not said, and are now attempting to change the narrative.
It is, but also it opens up a big can of worms: What additives are in materials like modified PLAs and how terrible they are. Which is honestly… was pretty much inevitable question to bring, once FDM manufacturers went towards kid’s toys market.
Long story short, they refused/haven’t.