Nice move, @Makerworld – you removed one of my (the designer’s) print profiles. You said it was a duplicate. This profile contained 21 interchangeable blades for my well known Bed Scraper XL. I created this profile purely for user convenience, as he needs to change these blades regularly.
I don’t think that’s helpful.
At the same time, you didn’t bother to check the many 3rd party print profiles with multiple blades – they still exist!
Not exactly encouraging…
Because they aren’t checking them, they are looking at user reports and acting on those, so someone reported it
I was going to give you a boost to cheer you up, but, damn, that model is popular, I will hold the Boost for a smaller designer where it will make more of an impact.
I have reported the four multiple-blade profiles, not the one with a handle a few blades as they will not do anything about that one.
Let’s see what happens.
They removed your profile because, in their rules, they say both Bambu Handy and Bambu Studio provide users with this capability.
I do not think the Bambu Handy implementation is clear enough, though.
I also would like to define how I share my models, including providing standard sets of things, even if that means duplicate models in a set.
I would not allow it in 3rd-party profiles at all. I do not like 3rd-party profiles that provide no material benefit, and I believe the designer should approve them.
I have made a few, and each one added something the designer didn’t wish to provide (A1 mini support back in the day, or colour versions of models only provided in a single colour), and if any designer asked me to remove one, I would without question. I sought approval fro most of them as I got a feel for MW.
First, I love your model, I am using it since “ever”.
It’s disgusting that there are sooo many print profiles. And I can see many violations, e.g. changing the models architecture or create additional parts. Don’t misunderstand, I think these things are great, but currently just against the rules.
And exactly because of this, I am tend to prefer the designer’s print profiles, even if another one sounds better, just to avoid to print an outdated version of the model.
Thanks for the feedback.
These constant rule changes annoy me; they simply create unnecessary work. For example, I’ve uploaded a whole series of dog whistles with different frequencies. For each whistle, I originally uploaded a profile with and without raised text. The text part isn’t created in the slicer; instead, the two versions are created separately from Fusion360. Since I expect takedowns here as well with the new rules, I’ve made versions without text private for now. It’s a shame for users; they’ll have to tinker with the slicer again instead of simply selecting the print profile they like.
There is a reason why I uploaded the variants in separate profiles: if there are multiple variants in a single profile, the displayed print time multiplies, which confuses the user.
It looks like the profiles I reported have all come down.