The problem with that is few here will do the calculations. Meanwhile, filament dryers and cheap hygrometers in wide use are all relative humidity.
And relative humidity is fine for most purposes.
You came out swinging saying how you were going to prove that using relative humidity for filament drying was a fallacy. You left it as a provocative and aggressive tease without stating what you were apparently after - absolute humidity is better.
But what you left hanging there was using RH was a fallacy without any qualification. Only in your final post did you clearly state what you were getting at. In your second post you buried your actual premise in backhanded insults and equations with no clear explanation of why.
If your premise was that using absolute humidity is the better metric, you could have saved us both a lot of trouble by stating that and not the unqualified using RH is a fallacy which is still incorrect. As to absolute humidity being a better metric, I agree with you because relative humidity can be deceptive.
What I was told when writing a paper is tell the audience what you are going to tell them. Then tell them. Then tell them what you told them. Instead, you came out with a provocative premise with zero support or clarification, threw a bunch of stuff on the wall, pointed to it and said “see”, and then got upset when I didn’t. You didn’t tell me what you were trying to tell me until you were slamming the door.
Sorry if I offended but you could have presented your case much better had you properly described the problem you were solving, and then showed us the solution, and then fitted that into current understandings.