I got a low rating here for the following reason:
“The design is excellent However, the printer performs excessive retractions, virtually guaranteeing a clog
This occurred three times consecutively Tried with PETG, PETG-HF, and Bambu PLA.”
How real is this reason, if at least 50 people were not too lazy to write a review that everything was fine? Or is this still an angry response from a person who is powerless in the face of a personal problem?
Without model to judge and settings it’s hard to judge… But if your print doesn’t have retraction changes then it’s likely the user has issues on their side, probably with AMS (i’d say spool but if they tried different spools then it’s on ams IMHO)
You will understand this person better if you read here: r/imthemaincharacter
It doesn’t matter because the comment is lost in a sea of good reviews. I just got a comment that due to the knurling on the side of my parts it takes oh so much longer to print… OK
I understand that there are such people. It’s just that if the stated reason does not apply to me, then I can calmly file a complaint for deletion.
Unrelated to the rating issue, but related to the model. You cannot use standard license if it’s a remix of Bambu’s model. You have to carry forward the license they used: CC BY-NC 4.0
The upload process should enforce this, but it does not.
Thanks, somehow it slipped my mind at the time of publication. Changed.
This is incorrect. It would be true if the Bambu’s licence was “CC BY-NC-SA”, if it’s “CC BY-NC” then the licence can be anything equally-or-more restrictive. For reference:
Check out this handy chart I found on Creative Commons Remixes - Collections and Remixes: What’s the Difference? - Research Guides at Hayden Memorial Library
Thank you for this info. At first glance it looks like I am mistaken and need to read up more on the copyright stuff. I’ll dig into it more after the holiday. I appreciate this!
