Latest MakerWorld update

There’s nothing about this that I found, so here’s my scoop:

Screenshot 2024-12-23 at 9.45.21 AM
Hashtags! Fun. Click the “Topic” button to add it, and then type it in.


You also might’ve spotted something else in the background: Visibility! This is pretty cool too, you can set it to public, private, or followers only.

And maybe I’m just not finding it, but unless you go to Share > Copy Link and then go to that link, you can’t get to the full post view anymore. I would prefer a full page, and also allow me to right click and open in a new tab (and middle click to open a new tab too!)

4 Likes

They’ve now announced them on MakerWorld too

I saw a brief display with a list of updates when I opened the site just now, but it quickly went away. Thanks for recapping the updates!


Should be under system notifications, they released it after I put this post out so I missed the video posting and guideline updates

3 Likes

I see it now. Those all look like great updates that should make the community better. Especially regarding the repeat posts.

2 Likes

Hmmmmm

6. Label AI-Generated Content

When uploading models or posts that generated by AI, please ensure that you clearly identify and flag the AI generated content.
Source

1 Like

They didn’t bother to post a link to the updated anything in the MakerWorld system notice.

Excellent communication skills as always.

Do we guess where the information is?

I had to Google them.

This might be the ones, who knows!

https://makerworld.com/en/community-guidelines

The profile guidelines for completeness.

3 Likes

And here are the Exclusive Model Guidelines

3 Likes

I’m reading the updated guidelines and it’ll be fun if they’ll try to enforce some of them :slight_smile:

First thing I’ve noticed in community guidelines:

  • Misinformation in model listings, posts, images, print profile listings or comments
    • Exaggeration of model functionalities
    • Using misleading phrases such as “Best, Top, Official” in model or print listing

Which makes me wonder that starting from 1st Jan the model discussed in Doo I report this is report-worthy :slight_smile: “great quality” my arse :slight_smile:

(btw: I hate the word misinformation - it’s totally unnecessary newspeak that should go away. “deception” “misleading” or “lies” are perfectly fine words, why not use them instead?)

Another fun one is:

Lottery and other promotional activities without authorization

Which should put an end to fake giveaways in community tab… But unfortunately the sentence above is “provided in the description models including”

Oh! This’ll wipe TONS of posts in the community tab:

8. Prohibited cheating activities such as:
[…]

  • Inducing or fraudulent activities such as boosting, liking, rating, printing, downloading, collecting, or commenting in exchange for monetary or other form benefits
  • Deliberately generating invalid or malicious traffic

Same section: AI Gen covers nuke incoming (that is - if enforced):

Any other form of cheating or deceptive behavior

It looks like print profile guidelines haven’t changed.

In regards to Exclusive Model Guidelines it seems a bit better… Now ALL the Hueforges and Lithopanes are excluded and examples given of what will be removed. They also clarified situation with “v2” vs “new model” in their view:

For example, V2/V3 of the same filament clip or orange peeler. If it’s an entirely new design, rename it as a new model but not using the same name and adding a V2. Only enter one version into the program. Other versions of the same model will be removed for not meeting the requirement for originality.

So - if you improved slightly your model that’s exclusive: update profile, don’t get “new model boost”, if you rebuilt your model from scratch: congrats on your totally new model :slight_smile:

Interesting, updates going in somewhat understandable direction, still far cry from good objective rules, but it’s and improvement nevertheless.

5 Likes

Do they ever seem to enforce anything that isn’t reported by the community? Hard to tell, but seems like a rare occurrence.

3 Likes

You were too fast and wrote it before i did :grin:

Can’t wait for January to see everything staying the same :sweat_smile:

3 Likes

I would like to see active content moderation, instead of needing to rely on reports - that being actioned is a hit and a miss…

btw:

:smiley:

6 Likes

So another layer of rules that will be selectively enforced?

3 Likes

I don’t know if it’s just me but I’ve noticed a weird change in model UI: The BOM is first, before the description… That’s… not good IMHO:

3 Likes

That is a dumb change.

It is hard enough having users not read the description that includes information they should know before printing, now they have to wade through information irrelevant to those instructions!

5 Likes

I don’t see it like that, it’s still in the old - proper - order :slight_smile:

1 Like

The BoM has clearly moved above the Description as @Johnny_Bit said.


2 Likes

not for me:


Hopefully they’ll patch the gaping hole in the exclusion program that’s been allowing people to enter into it without a profile of their own. :man_facepalming:

3 Likes

Uneven rollout of deployment. I hope they rollback this change thought. I’m with @MalcTheOracle on that - I very much preffer description before BOM.

Doubt. The “joint the program” button is before “add the print profile” section. But then the print profile is in the requirements of the program so…