I just want to point out that this image could be fake. Either way, it’s meaningless. It could have been edited using Photoshop. It’s also possible that a different text was first entered, the result copied, and then a new text entered. Why is only a snippet ever shown, and never the full result? Exactly!
The fact that it shows 100% human is almost impossible because there are always inaccuracies, which suggests that it is fake.
Why is he deliberately hiding the provider / website? Why?
You don’t do that by accident, do you? Are you just using as a excuse that we don’t use the same website? Then just name the website and show the full picture.
I’ve tested various providers now - both free and paid - and they all agree on one thing: AI. I’m posting the entire screen, not just a snippet:
Furthermore, there is no need for an AI detector since this user has always had this tendency in the past. Always. It’s a pattern that runs throughout his entire forum history.
Now, about the “hidden profile” feature: It doesn’t really do anything. You can just type your two nicknames into the forum’s search bar or Google: it’s all public anyway:
- L0rdS474n - Lord Ulf Henrik Holmberg
- TheSwedishLord
This isn’t confidential information - it’s all publicly available. You can find it all on YouTube, X/Twitter, GitHub, MakerWorld, the Prusa forum and company websites.
It’s important to mention this again so I don’t leave myself open to criticism: All of these are public profiles - a quick Google search will confirm that. A Google search brings up a lot more private information. I’ll stick to public vs. private. No personal information.
Also, this isn’t proof, but just to put things in context: OP always acts like he has nothing to do with AI at all, yet his public GitHub project is full of AI tools, chat boots, etc. This isn’t an accusation, it’s just important to note for context:
L0rdS474n (Lord Ulf Henrik Holmberg) / Repositories · GitHub
Let’s go back to the Bambu search. This isn’t the first time this has happened - it’s a constant issue. It’s always been this way. The OP has absolutely no credibility or grounds for their accusations. There has never been any evidence, just accusations.
He had already used AI much more obviously in a previous post:
The whole thing is just 95% nonsense: What may have started as an attempt to document something - because the OP thinks he’s being clever - is just a huge circus, a farce, a show - call it what you will. I suspect that, combined with the goal of reporting as many users as possible whom he can’t stand, this is my own interpretation. Not facts, but observations.
Someone who thinks he’s incredibly smart, but then fails spectacularly, because at the end of the day, only one thing matters: evidence - and that’s always missing!
Edit: Text formatted