Low rating due to self-interrupted print?

Nearly dropped off my chair when I read the reason for a 3-star rating.
“great print would rate a 4-5 but I stoped (sic) it and took it off early”
= another user #blocked

7 Likes

I feel like this is a Maker World issue honestly. They only allow a max of 3 stars on failed prints and are actively pushing users to review.

11 Likes

Why even rate it then? I really don’t understand some people. It made some since when they gave points for rating, but that ended.

2 Likes

Wait, you’ll find out that not only self-interrupted prints can be reviewed, but also:

  • Completely different settings for the print profile
  • A completely different item placed on the plate afterwards
  • Object rotated into impossible positions
  • Cut into thousands of pieces by slicer
  • Classic: Completely different filament
  • And now the best part: stuff you haven’t even printed, not at all. The file transfer is enough.
3 Likes

because the app generates notifications to the user to do it, and a huge % of the population follows any action that is prompted to them

5 Likes

Exactly, the app still annoys me to this day with its constant requests to rate failed prints. :expressionless_face:

3 Likes

There needs to be an option to turn those off. On the rare occurrence that a print fails, it is the users fault most of the time.

I just wont even rate it. (Unless there are obvious issues with the profile that can be seen in studio).

6 Likes

The issue to me is that the rating is for the slicer settings, rather than the model.

I have tried to give 4 ratings for products, and they get rejected with a comment along the lines of not relevant. Clearly someone who has posted the model didn’t like my review and are precious about not getting 5.

One example was I gave a rating of 4* for a lightbox with the comment, “Would have been 5* had it not been for lack of the diffuser and the addition of a hole for power feed which was not compatible and could not be altered.” (They hadn’t added the hole as a negative in the slicer, so couldn’t be removed to revert back to solid).

This I believe was a realistic rating for the model, and included feedback and constructive criticism.

Having EVERY single model rated 5 makes the whole thing pointless, exactly the same as if it were rated 1*.

FWIW, To get a rough idea of what I think a model is like I divide the likes (and or comments) by the downloads.

1 Like

You can appeal a bad rating

And that’s the issue. People have genuine feedback which is just appealed against and then deleted.

Leaving the next poor sap to look “Ooh it’s 5* it must be great”.

I’m much likely to believe an overall rating of 4.8, rather than 5.0

1 Like

You shouldn’t appeal a bad rating

Unless there is obvious foul play

1 Like

Pretty sure that would be considered foul play and a bad rating

Read the last 6 comments.

The conversation has diverted from that one example.

The initial thread concerns that rating not users comments / opinions

So the conversation is over then. If people like you want to be narrow minded.

@JonRaymond seems like time to close this topic

2 Likes

My experience: MakerWorld only removes reviews that are not actually bad, but nonsense that does not comply with the rules. As I said, that is my personal experience. However, in 95% of cases, the authors of negative reviews fail to describe the problem or provide a photo, thereby violating the rules.

Therefore, in my personal opinion, it is not possible to have a well-written review with photos deleted simply because of a poor rating. However, I am sure that there are other experiences as well.

The fundamental problem with negative reviews is often the following: The creator should be supported in resolving the issue. Very rarely, I also write a negative review, but I post photos of the printout and the slicer, as well as a detailed description, and there have never been any problems.

In short: a bad review should serve to solve the problem, not to harm the creator. This is where most people fail.

4 Likes

report the rating and it will get removed.

Some forums actually allow the OP to moderate comments, like You Tube for example.

Sometimes I receive 3 stars with the comment”excellent print but system won’t let me rate more than 3 stars”. Dang why leave a rating ?

1 Like

Because the app bothers you even when the printing has been canceled or was only partially printed. It literally forces it on you. Aborted print means a maximum of 3 stars allowed. Such ratings almost always come from the app.

1 Like