Real Print Photo in for Model

MakerWorld
168

As long as you have one “real life photo” marked as such that includes no AI, then there shouldn’t be a problem I would say. Make the AI enhanced photo your cover image and have the same image with no AI marked as the real life one, or another angle of the print marked as real life.

They’re not disallowing AI photos, just requiring at least one real life photo.

But, IMO, the AI enhanced photo is also real life, because the real print is there and unmodified. It’s no different than adding text to the photo or removing the background. I wouldn’t call photos like that “not real” either.

1 Like
169

Copy and paste is your friend.

“Model photos are not real life, this violates the real life photo rule.”

Copy that and paste it when you’re reporting. Keep it in a handy place to copy.

170

There is no human in the existing verification process an while AI is good, it can’t be used to flag those that provide photos that fail to match the verification provided.

171

It actually is different though the changes are tiny and I missed them first pass looking to see if the original image was changed. But very true about other images. I’m not caught out but others could be.

I also thought of another approach - I could copy paste the real model back onto the AI modified one. That would remove changes made by AI and take it back to being the real model image.

1 Like
172

I am saying that human intervention will most likely be needed to handle the reports for these.

Though I could see them implementing an AI detection feature for the photos marked as real print images.

I say give it a week or so and see how it works out.

There are always going to be bad actors out there. At least now it makes it clear to people that are uneducated of the rules that having a real print image is supposed to be the standard.

2 Likes
173

I was when cast as enforcer number 2 in a movie that never made it to launch.

2 Likes
174

Real 3D model, real photograph with jelly bean spaghetti and jelly bean eyes.

AI background generated in Photoroom, this app only changes the background, the 3D model remains intact, like cutting it out in Photoshop and changing the background.

I don’t know how to classify the photo either, real or AI?

IMG_1375
IMG_13751920×2560 453 KB

IMG_13752
IMG_137522016×1512 776 KB

175

I tried to do the same, test AI tools to replace the background without affecting the model photo.

Yet, it always affects the foreground.

Unless you remove the foreground model and place it onto a new background, it is AI, not a photo.

Even using an AI background should require some declarations.

I have noted that house listings are now showing furniture in empty rooms using “virtual staging”. They declare that in most cases though.

176

Try Photoroom, it doesn’t touch the model’s image, it’s like automatic Photoshop with AI-generated backgrounds.

177

I draw your attention to.

As I made two points.

178

There are visual tricks even with good film cameras. The problem is those trying to deceive. In a world where AI just keeps getting more realistic and how easy it is to generate images, it may take a lot of human intervention to control this.

It could take a lot of human intervention.

1 Like
179

(post deleted by author)

180

I completely missed the announcement and misread your message thinking this was launched last night. I agree, this is a good thing!

181

Look at this fool!

Oh wait, not that one.

3 Likes