Since When Is Cleavage NSFW? A Female Creator's Experience With MW

Your art and model is fantastic. Personally I see nothing wrong with it and I’ve seen more suggestive and explicit models. Sorry for your struggles :frowning:

This is not art. This is the Devil in pure form, tempting vulnerable children and men.

Every time I make these comments, I get flooded with one-star ratings from some S.tanists. So be it.

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

MW allowing you to post NSFW content is already generous.

This is not about sexuality or nakedness. You can portray the naked human body as something beautiful without making it a tool of temptation. This is about the Devil himself.

Even your model’s description is devilish and deceptive. You describe it as something interesting and good, but the Devil is neither interesting nor good.

WHY would you expose children to this if you truly have their best interests in mind?

What good does the Devil do for the world? Nothing. Quite the opposite: w.cked, m.schievous actions, m.sfortunes, cr.mes, suffering, moral corruption, destructive behav.ors, promote chaos, and drive s1n or su1fering in the world, torment, harass, pester, or cause severe d1stress continuously, undermine moral values, divide.

Look at your post. It creates d1vision and st1rs up conflict. It certainly does not create peace or unity. Ev1l creates more ev1l.

Perhaps that is why these models are so popular, and why some pseudo-art1sts take the quick and easy route to popularity by exploiting those impulses and spreading w1ckedness under the label of “art.”

W.r, s x, and v1olence have always been easy to sell, quickly and in large quantities. Exploiting them does not make you a great artist.

You are clearly a skilled modeller. But an artist? Raise the bar. Create something that leaves children—and the world—better off for having seen it. Something that inspires and uplifts them.

O Divine Eternal Father, in union with Your Divine Son and the Holy Spirit, and through the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I beg You to destroy the power of Your greatest enemy—the ev1l spirits. Cast them into the deepest recesses of h..l and chain them there forever!

The puddle, meaning MakerWorld, is already dirty. After all, MakerWorld explicitly allows erotic toys, just to name one example. So what do you mean by “western views” when makerWord is completely ■■■■■■, ■■■■■■■ & in your ■■■■■■, oh my god this ■■■■■■■■■■!

I understand your comment, and I actually agree with some of your points. However, the real issue here seems to be that OP depicted a stong woman, rather than creating an obviously erotic toy in the first place. That’s an exaggeration - because ■■■ toys are allowed on MakerWorld.

I’d say that MakerWorld has one of the largest collections of deldos (term changed), right up there with Cults3D. Why does it make sense that MakerWorld has a problem with what OP posted, but not with deldos? Sarcasm: Because they’re for the whole family?


Because one is an art and the other is up ■■■■ into ■■■■■■■ and then ■■■■■! That doesn’t make any sense, even when we take Chinese culture or Bambu as a company into account.


Sarcasm: Meanwhile, at Bambu HQ “Anything you can shove up your ■■■ is allowed!”

Whaat? I can’t hear what y’all saying.

I think the issue is quite simpler. OP didn’t depict anyone or have any inherent meaning, but rather posted something borderline not OK (by MW “standards”) and got whacked by Chinese AI algorithm that was discussed here many times … And OP got butthurt and brought all those walls of text.

Yeah, it sucks. Uneven application of vaporware rules suck. But what can we do? Just stop using it. Quite simple. But nope, everyone gets baited by points system to grab those $40 buckaroo gift cards.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: OMG I almost snorted soda out my nose​:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: That was funny. But I 100% agree. Moving on from Maker World.

It’s all good :slight_smile: Plenty of other places to share​:heart:And thank you​:heart:

That could be the right thing to do. I think a big part of your difficulty comes from forgetting that MW is a platform of a private company.

Think of MW as a private house party. The host sets the rules, not the guests. The guests can’t force their value or preferences on the host. The host doesn’t even owe any guest a public debate on the rules. Don’t like the rules, don’t come and don’t stay.

Make sure when you say you leave, do it. Don’t be like some others who have been saying they are leaving but never do, or they had a big fanfare saying goodbye and then sneaked back quietly.

I’m not that invested here. Due to some unfortunate circumstances over the summer I wasn’t able to design as much as I wanted to so didn’t have a lot of uploads. I only have a few models here so it’s no sweat off my back to move on. :blush:

Leave a post here with your other spots; I’d like to follow the artist. :slight_smile:

Speaking of ridiculousness. I mentioned a plush bear in my comment above… and guess what. That comment was purged and not even a mention or warning that it was deleted.

Honestly… this forum went from a quite a free-speech place to a censoring pile. I really start to dislike this attitude.

I ■■■ respond ■■ ■■■■ comment - ■ considered ■■ harmless - but the ■■■■■ was probably ■■■■ there ■■■ ■ political statement ■■ a single sentence, and ■■■■ gets deleted immediately.

Do ■■■ ■■■ ■■■■ I mean? ■■■■ not sure ■■■■, ■■■■■ and ■■■■ its getting worse!

■■■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■■, ■■■■■ next ■■■ ■■■■■!

■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■


…and now for something a little more serious: Normally, you should get a notification telling you which moderator it was, but if you didn’t get the notification, that was on purpose to hide the name - very sneaky.

I was mildly curious to see an email about content “violation” in my Bambu Labs email, which is all plain-text in Thunderbird. So I took a look and read your post here.
WOW. It’s a shame to see you move on, if you are the artist of that model. I think she is stunningly well done. If you are making that level of art, you should be able to sell your work to games and various publications. The only thing I would say is try to work on the way she holds the knife; The way she is holding seems more like holding it to look at, than to use it. You have to have a really good grip on a knife to use them successfully.

But as to the content restriction - I think this is clearly artistic, not salacious. She is attractively curvy, but no prominent ni##les or pubic outlines that pander to base instincts. And the attention to details in her jewelry and flowing dress, and in the scene around her, clearly shows artistic, not salacious intent. And your artistic intent of a strong feminine figure is well accomplished. Would I print this for me? No, because I print boring tool and household stuff, (although I did make a dragon doorstop for my youngest daughter when she went off to college).
But would I print this for my 2 D&D/gamer daughters? Yes, in a heartbeat, because it is girl-power and girl-pride, made by a girl, which is exactly what I encourage in my daughters. And part of that is encouraging them to not let anyone tell them what they “can’t” do! (Although the dad in me says she should be wearing some sort of protective footwear in case she steps on something sharp, LOL).
When it comes to public art, I tell my son and daughters, that whatever it is, consider on whether or not it could be harmful to someone else, and if so, limiting the audience may be wise. BUT, this level of femininity is advertised on public forums (TV) for all audiences, and expresses no controversial themes such as denigrating religious figures or gory violence, so there is no basis there. This is proud feminine art, done stunningly well. It should be on the cover of a book or a magazine, and people should be glad to pay to print it. I would!
So you do you, Tinker_Nook. And leave the hypocrite nay-sayers eating your dust!

I will Bratling​:heart: You can always checkout my website too Tinkerandnook.com I’m still in the midst of designing the website but it is open. :blush: And I’ll always be under the Tinker and Nook name… Or Tinkerandnook on other platforms. If you, or anyone who was cordial and insightful in this conversation wants a design made, I’ll gladly do it free of charge. Send me a pm​:heart:

Winnie-The-Pooh-oh-bother

(stinky bait? now I’m curious how trigger happy the zampolit are.)

it just sounds just like classic Bambu Labs. They did something similar to Powell, the developer of Orca Slicer-Bambu Lab

no need to annouce you are leaving, This reminds me all of those twitter people saying they are leaving only to be back 2 weeks later…

I am not into fantasy art, yet, when I am out and about and I encounter a fantasy art store, I often go inside and look around. Also, over the years I have known a few people who decorate their work and/or living spaces with fantasy art.

When one looks at the more popular fantasy sculptures they tend to look more like this:

Good art tends to have a flow to it. It is one of those fundamental concepts that is taught to aspiring artists. Especially so when figure drawing and sculpting.

I wouldn’t want my Grandkids looking at that

Then you’d have to block MakerWorld, and really the entire internet, YouTube, and so on. You’d even have to block regular TV. You see stuff like that even in mainstream magazines these days.


A better approach would be to help both yourself and your grandkids develop good digital literacy skills, and to teach them how to approach women (or men) with respect and maturity, and NSFW topics, in an age-appropriate way, of course.

It takes some time, patience, and a genuine interest in your grandkids, but in the long run, that’s likely to be far more effective.


Why? You’d probably be surprised by the kinds of things kids share with each other on their phones at school these days. That’s exactly why teaching media literacy and having open, age-appropriate conversations is often more effective than simply trying to block everything.

I think the bigger issue is that many parents or grandparents often lack either the confidence or the interest to actively teach and guide their children when it comes to these topics.

Kids are naturally curious, and the internet isn’t going away. That’s why parental involvement, open conversations, and guidance are usually much more valuable than trying to shield them from everything.


Sorry for the slight off-topic comment, but I feel this was worth mentioning.