The softest Bambu TPU is here!

Announcements
21

I would probably print vanes for arrows, or flights for them if possible.

22

I would design some hair pin and maybe some bracelet, the blue one would be so good for that

23

I have printed many parts over the years for customers, built custom voron printers just to be able to print ninjaflex lava, I made some case for remotes, made some parts for dampers in machineri as well, id love to try it out but im curious as why its not suported 85a with 0,4 nozzle ? thanks

24

Bambu really should find out a way to make AMS print soft TPU. It might be hard, but it is important and will be a huge leap from other brands now. I may print softer things now with the new TPU like… better squishies?

2 Likes
25

I’d love to try it out to make a custom Elbow Rest for the Vertical Reference position in the cockpit of a Sikorsky S92 aircraft? The pilots currently have a block of foam… seems a little low tech and hokey.

IMG_8414
IMG_8414640×853 112 KB

IMG_8413
IMG_8413640×853 134 KB

IMG_8412
IMG_8412640×853 127 KB

5 Likes
26

I have a strange shoe size so I like the idea of making a custom pair with this material. Also, the accompanying wiki for this filament is particularly helpful!

27

For those interested in this filament, BE SURE to review the limitations for the printers that work. There are some significant requirements that Bambu is suggesting, like removing the toolhead PTFE and feeding the 85A directly in to the toolhead from a very short distance and required height, or the previously mentioned 0.6mm and 0.8mm nozzles for the 85A.

Its not the end of the world, but is significant, because many Bambu users just want things to work and these new filaments do not fall into that category. However, for those willing to modify the printers and prep before printing, these do look super interesting.

8 Likes
28

Honestly, I’d bet its not terribly difficult to design an AMS for a 95A, but I suspect it would be expensive. More motors and higher tolerances to keep the filament from binding, along with an expensive constraint path and an elaborate buffer. If a TPU AMS cost you $800 or $900 and came with a more time consuming maintenance schedule would you be in line to buy one? Personally, I would balk at that. Especially, considering that the 90A and 85A would likely not work without a new printer (as the toolhead modifications that are needed suggest the current printers can’t feed it reliably). Too much money, for a one trick pony. Maybe there will be some breaks in material science that enhances other aspects and make it cost effective, but until then, I think we will be waiting.

1 Like
29

Sex toys spring to mind.

A few MakerSupply additions and they would be great gifts for friends and family.

12 Likes
30

I’m sorry …what ?! :joy:

Happy Easter Aunt Velma - why…are you red and embarassed? It’s the new tpu? You don’t like? Isn’t is soft enough? :open_mouth: :sweat_smile:

also it’s pourous - can’t / wouldn’t / icky :wink: lol

6 Likes
31

I know you are saying that silicon would be better, but we do not have that technology yet.

Plus, certain sheaves can protect the porous issues.

From what little I know about Aunt Velma, she would appreciate the effort that goes into a homemade gift.

5 Likes
32

If your family is adopting please let me know - sounds much more fun than mine haha

I still think out of all the “best” ideas for tpu so far is the newer foaming variable shore one(s).

Then companies can just produce 1 type - it be the best that they can do in foaming to really dial it in and nobody would have to deal with the 45-199U pfff wacko ratings.

Then like esun could make theirs, bambu can do theirs and we all ahve foaming tpu - just their own brands. we all know setting say…245 for X gives this yada yada

A standardized chart for standardized foaming tpu.

Ahh my fantasy dreams. right up there with your family adoption lol :laughing:

3 Likes
33

love the shoes can I get them???

34

This is a great idea and implementation. An upgrade is what I was looking for.

35

This is an excellent concept and execution—exactly the kind of improvement I was hoping to see!

36

BL dropped the ball in one area. They show wearable prints, yet when you read the MSDS section 11, Toxological information, is has “No data available” for irritation and Allergenicity.

I bring this up because Sirya Techs 85A and 95A filament is actually certified for biocompatibility. Plus, it’s $9 cheaper and is also developed for higher speed printing than normal 85A.

Here’s the statement:

  • ISO 10993 Tested: Our Flex TPU 85A has undergone testing according to ISO 10993-10, -5, and -23 protocols. These tests evaluate biological responses to materials, providing data on potential biocompatibility. This testing helps ensure peace of mind when printing for external-use wearables and devices.

They even provide images of the certification certificates in their listing.

4 Likes
37

Following last Bambu Lab com, it’ll be available on MakerWorld soon :crossed_fingers:

38

They need to redesign the AMS from the ground up, in order for it to work with TPU, they need to redesign it to work without Bowden tubes.

39

:rofl:

TPU on bare skin, then in the dog’s mouth – all that’s missing is a child playing with it. Of course, I never want to see detailed CE documentation or any evidence of chemical residues for the applications. Is asbestos still legal in China?

4 Likes
41

I may try a spool of both, her indoors had a hip operation and her leg is now 1" shorter which has caused spinal displacement while she’s walking. It’s something I’ve been thinking of to fit in a shoe and slipper… :thinking:

2 Likes