A possible way to estimate water content in filaments

Just putting this out there but while working with my poly cereal boxes, I put a spool of fresh PETG HF from its poly bag into a cereal box without a desiccant pack and was surprised to see the humidity in the poly box start climbing up.

Just checked this morning and ambient humidity in the room is 39%, the spool of PETG HF in a poly container is showing 42%, and a spool of ASA that I had dried for a few hours yesterday is showing 25% RH in a poly cereal box. Again, no desiccant to scavenge out water.

I think poly boxes without desiccant might be a way to get a handle on water content in filament by putting a spool in a poly container with a hygrometer, closing it up, and let it equilibrate to a stable humidity reading. The humidity should be a function of water content in the filament and may get skewed with cardboard hubs and spools but still should give an idea of how wet the filament is.

I doubt you can directly compare moisture contents from one filament type to another but within a family like PLA, you can probably say if one spool is wetter than another and people may be able to find humidity levels that predict if there will be printing issues or not.

We don’t have a way to determine actual water content in a filament but this might be a way to indirectly measure water content without having to dry to get a weight change, etc. Everything else has been a change - how much water was lost and so on but nothing to actually get a handle on water content. This might give a number related to actual water content.

I’m sure they’ll find a way to do it reliably, the day before they release hydrophobic filament. I try not to overthink it and weigh/dry/weigh for a 6hr cycle initially then keep the coil in a reasonably stable state till its used up. Sometimes it gets a few topup treatments along the way if defects show up.

I think the cost of testing and the intervention is the prohibitive, particularly when you can only test the outer few layers if the coil is wound reasonably well. Same goes for drying for most of us I think getting the extremes would be a bit too destructive.

I don’t see the destructive aspect. I think actually getting a handle on water content in filament can prevent 24 hour and longer cooks which reportedly can damage filament through “overdrying” (I’m not sure there is such a thing. It’s more likely thermal degredation.).

Anyway, playing around more with this, I dried a spool of brown PETG HF yesterday to 24% RH in the drying chamber (experimenting with how much drying is needed and hit 24% in about 5 hours with dry air purge. This morning I put the orange PETG HF in the dryer and put the spool of brown PETG HF in the poly box the orange came out of and in about a half hour the humidity fell from 42% to now showing 10% - the lowest the hygrometer will indicate.

That’s at room temperature while the drying was a 55C when I pulled it at 24% RH. RH has a big temperature dependence.

So fresh from the bag orange PETG HF stabilized at 42% RH overnight while dried PETG HF is now showing below 10% RH. Looks like it’s doing a good job of saying which spool was dried and which wasn’t.

As to cost, these poly boxes are just a few dollars each at Amazon and the hygrometers are about a dollar. That’s how much this test costs plus some time for things to equilibrate.

It’s not overthinking it, either. While you may not have issues with moisture, lots of other people do. This is an indirect measure of moisture content in filament. That’s a question a lot of people have. Many are unsure if their drying technique is actually drying. This can tell them for even less money than buying a good scale. It can also be used as a diagnostic, albeit slow, if a particular filament isn’t printing properly. Just check its humidity in a closed impermeable box.

What is missing is some kind of guidance on what humidity levels with each filament type start having issues with printing defects. That can come as people get experience.

But the test itself is trivially easy, many already have the bits to do this, and so far it’s working really well. That I can put dried spools in and it pegs the hygrometer low while undried spools are testing out with water content seems to show it’s working. That I can put a dried spool in and it pegs the hygrometer low is just more validation my drying technique is also working.

I’m really curious what others will find but this is looking good. It’s not destructive. It’s trivially cheap. You don’t have to believe it or do it. If your drying is working for you, great, but if you check the threads here, you’re an outlier.

A possible way to estimate water content in filaments

Erm, suck hard, really hard?

I had to say it, before some else did.

Now, smart people you may continue, the moron has left the building.

There are tools specifically designed to test the water content of solids. Generally classified as “Moisture Meters”. Get one of those, it ought to work on plastic same as it works on anything else that can absorb moisture. Like dirt and wood and sheetrock.

2 Likes

I don’t need a moisture meter. The way I dry my filament works great.

Out of curiosity I looked up models that would be appropriate for plastics and they are thousands of dollars. Moisture meters you stab into wood are not appropriate for plastics is my understanding. If you know better, please enlighten. Maybe you know of or have a cheaper one that works.

The purpose of the original post was there have been lots of issues with filament drying and things like scales don’t tell you much if there isn’t much weight change during drying and prints still have issues.

Many have the poly boxes and hygrometers and I noticed the relationship between wet/dry and humidity in a poly box with no desiccant. It’s a trivially easy test that many already have what they need to try.

But I luckily I don’t need to even use this technique. As I said, my filament is “dry” and prints great. I just thought it could help others. If your moisture meter is a good deal that would benefit the community, you should start your own thread with all the details about how well it works for you, and how it has helped with filament drying, if it has helped with filament drying.

I just throw the spool in the dryer while I’m finishing up my CAD work, a day or so in advance of when I’ll be printing. No worrying about how to store the filament to keep it dry. No worrying about how dry it may or may not be. All that matters is the storage is relatively dust-free.

So I don’t need a moisture meter, either. The way I dry my filament works great.

:slight_smile:

AI says this about that, though:

Yes, you can use a less expensive moisture meter for 3D printing plastic filament, but it may not be as accurate as specialized meters. Some users have found success using general moisture meters designed for wood or concrete, which can be quite affordable (around $20-$50). However, these meters might not provide precise measurements for filament moisture content.

Another option is to use a filament dryer, which can help reduce moisture in your filament. Devices like the Matterhackers PrintDry PRO are available for under $250 and can hold multiple spools of filament at once. While this doesn’t measure moisture content directly, it helps ensure your filament is dry and ready for printing.

1 Like

So, you don’t have drying issues, don’t have experience with measuring moisture or know why cheap meters for wood and drywall don’t work well with plastic, and even your AI source tells you that regular meters are inaccurate with plastics when asked again?

Meanwhile, this thread is about dunking a spool in a poly box, waiting, and reading a number. No comments about that except go buy a tool that doesn’t work for this application? Ever helpful.

How is it better to advise people to spend hundreds to thousands on a meter just because you heard of it somewhere and take what AI says at face value even if it’s wrong?

It’s great you don’t have filament moisture issues. If you read through many posts here you would see quite a few do have those problems. As strange as it may seem, I wasn’t talking to you when I started this thread you ■■■■ on. :grin::grin::grin: (I can also include smileys) It was an attempt to help the people with filament moisture issues while you jump in and send them on a wild goose chase.

Learn to check your AI answers before you spread them like gospel. AI is trained on very flawed data sets. Just like the pictures it draws with too many fingers or arms, in this case it seems to have told you to use the wrong tool. Only when you asked it again did it say a regular moisture meter might give inaccurate data.

Here’s a thought - go read some actual plastics industry literature on how they test and control moisture because they sure do. They have the same water issues we do when hot plastic gets injected into molds and have decades of experience. Had you done that instead of polluting this thread with AI bull because you wanted to make some point, you would have seen right off that they say you can’t use regular moisture meters for plastics. Part of the reason is the conductivity ranges are very different. Ask your AI what that means.

And since you are touting the benefits of AI and how to dry filament, can you tell us why that Matterhackers dryer is not ideal? Or any of the common filament dryers? Do you even understand what this thread is about?