If I were to guess, the enclosure might be common between the two but the flame sensors might be incorporated into the birds eye camera which is only included in the laser version.
Sadly enough I have to disagree.
I am a private consumer that is willing to spend 2200 euros on a machine and my only use case is non commercial hobby stuff.
Next to that is it quite weird that you degrade MY perception to an anecdote. Since it is MY perception from people I know there is no way you can claim that.
The same applies for small businesses. All the small businesses with some exceptions here solely use WiFi. That includes our dentist, our cardealship, our local Inn etc.
And it is MY opinion that WiFi is sufficient to have the device do what you want.
2 Likes
Users who tested and posted reviews also made a point to use CF materials as test parameters… Everyone should know by now that you’ll hide everything on the surface if you print CF filament…
I want real world tests with real scenario materials. Print PLA Basic grey, yellow and black while recording the results.
This is a great example that nothing was enhanced or implemented to improve linear motions. Only claim was improving “accuracy” but not details. I mean wouldn’t you have jumped out the seat if you seen them address VFA’s by saying “VFA’s no more, due to encoder-servo stepper motors and precision ball screws paired with Y axis linear rails”
They widened the XY belt and attached a Linear rail on the gantry… Z is driven by 1 traditional stepper and same design as the last generation using 3 screws and 3 rods. From a technical stand point, I see no innovation with the H2D what so ever but that’s my opinion.
2 Likes
There’s a perfect solution for you, don’t buy it! There’s plenty of alternatives out there, go for one of those
Most definitely will not BUT will keep an eye out for anyone that’s not happy with it and happens to post it on local listings 
Hahah I’m confused you don’t like the printer or you don’t like the price? Granted I’ve only ran it for a few hours, but I can’t imagine anyone listing it for cheap 
1 Like
Olias, I am one who this printer is for. Professionally.
I’m a Reverse Enginerd and I make automotive coelacanths.
For the lost… I bring back items items that are no longer available but still useful, by reverse engineering them. I use all sorts of tools and these hobby level machines are serious enough for the work I am doing at small fractions of the cost of full “Professional” machines. I have a friend who is a machinist and design engineer who spent $10k on a professional 3d printer and our 2 X1C’s produce prototypes that are indiscernable from his prototypes, aside from sometimes being multicolored, which his printer can not do.
“The good carpenter doesn’t blame his tools.” And the tools Bambu is making are pretty fantastic for my use case.
So maybe its not for you, but I will use the print functions in ALL the ways it can be used. And the laser will do more marking than cutting but will definitely be used multiple times per year. I don’t need either every day, but I do have need of both.
Short answer. ME.
1 Like
Good D-g I hate that statement.
It really should be, “A good carpenter chooses the correct tools for the task at hand.”
Implicit in that statement is that the good carpenter will seek out the correct tool for the task if it is not readily available. I won’t blame the flat-blade screwdriver if it doesn’t work with a Philips-head screw. I will get the correct-size Philips-head screwdriver. But no work will be done until the correct tool is acquired.
All I mean by that statement, and all I’ve ever taken it to mean, is that a true artisan will do good work with the tools he has available to him.
Sometimes that means he will make a new tool with the tools he already has to do better work. I in no way insinuated that the carpenter is “blaming” anything.
But simply buying a better tool is definitely the easy way.
Look bud, you take it however you like. I meant no offense so if you took any just go ahead and drop it. It wasn’t for you anyway.
The question is, then, “what do you mean by good?”