I am posting this publicly because I have attempted to resolve this matter privately through Bambu Lab’s support system, but after nearly two weeks, I still have not received an acknowledgement of the concern I am actually raising. My customer-service complaint has repeatedly been treated as a duplicate technical-support request and redirected back to the original support agent whose handling of that case is the subject of my complaint.
I resolved my printer issues on my own, in no part due to any advice given by the support team.
My A1 Mini began producing inconsistent prints and inaccurate dimensions. Before contacting Support, I performed extensive troubleshooting and provided multiple photographs showing the problem occurring with both Bambu and generic filament.
Despite this, Support told me:
“It looks like the issue is low quality filament, as the bambu filament prints look perfect.”
The Bambu filament did not produce a perfect print. It was only marginally better, and my photographs showed that the same underlying problem was still present. I explained this to Support.
From my perspective as a customer, this was particularly frustrating because Bambu filament retails for roughly twice the price of the generic filament I was using. Being told that my problem was caused by “low quality filament” and that Bambu’s much more expensive filament was the apparent solution felt less like a diagnosis and more like being directed toward purchasing Bambu’s filament before the printer itself had been properly diagnosed. If I had not pushed for further help, I would have been stuck with the same issue, having wasted money on filament that I did not need to spend money on.
While waiting for their next response, I continued troubleshooting and discovered the actual issue myself: I had been using the wrong lubricant on the printer’s motion system. After completely removing the old lubricant, the problem was resolved.
I fully acknowledge that using the wrong lubricant was my mistake. My concern is that I provided evidence showing the problem persisted with Bambu filament, yet Support still identified filament as the apparent cause before establishing whether the printer itself had a mechanical issue.
I subsequently opened a separate customer-service complaint about how the technical-support case was handled. I explicitly stated that I was not seeking further technical support, compensation, or replacement parts.
That complaint was labeled a duplicate of my original technical-support ticket. After explaining that it was a complaint about the handling of that ticket, rather than a request for technical assistance, I was told it would be redirected to the same agent whose handling of the original case is the subject of my complaint.
My question to Bambu Lab is simple:
Why was “low quality filament” identified as the apparent cause despite the photographic evidence I provided showing that the same problem occurred with Bambu filament?
I am not disputing that checking the motion system was a reasonable troubleshooting step. I am questioning why the evidence I provided was apparently insufficient to prevent Support from treating filament as the likely cause.
I have spent a great sum of money on Bambu products and had previously been a satisfied customer. I would really like to see this reviewed by someone in Bambu Lab’s customer-service management rather than being repeatedly redirected to the original support agent.




