The original version of Bambu Handy displayed correctly when the iPad is in the landscape orientation which is the orientation I use most of the time.
Every version after that the screen is oriented sideways which makes monitoring a print less than ideal and MakerWorld unusable. I do any searching for models on my iPad, so MakerWorld gets a pass.
I don’t think it is unreasonable to expect Bambu Handy to display correctly in landscape orientation. Please fix it.
I would also ask for the share feature that works on the iPhone to work on the iPad. It is there, it looks like it works - it just doesn’t.
Handy on iPad is terrible, it should come with an age restriction warning for anyone who is between 3yo and 90yo. The only good part is I don’t need my reading glasses to use it 
I have just bought an X1c, everything is as I expected , seamless, works out of the box, and then… I came to install the app on my iPad Pro, its a disaster, please can this get some attention, maybe even a Bambu Studio for iPad 
As of today, there’s still no solution from what I can see. Can someone Bambu Support confirm this is in the works? It’d be nice to even use Bambu Studio on a iPad Pro too.
It is unfortunate Bambu Lab won’t make the change. I actually put in a ticket on it and they didn’t see it as important enough. I was surprised because Bambu Studio is such a delight to use.
It will take a lot of iPad users making noise to get their attention on this one.
It’s also the reason I don’t use MakerWorld. When I surf the net looking for models, I use Printables and Thingiverse because they work in landscape view on my iPad and display more models on the screen (4 is pretty lame in my opinion.).
is this still not receiving any attention ? its so needed to be put right on the ipad
Fixing the orientation is not that hard. Not enough people have complained which is why it’s not a priority. If a popular 3D Printing YouTuber mentioned it, I believe it would be fixed in short order. Ironically in the very first version of this app the orientation was correct.