and its also funny to see that the image to " help" the calibration goes to 0.017…how in the world am i supposed to know the number after 0.01, i thought it would be 0.005, that seem logical to have that between 0.01 and 0.02, ,making it 0.015, how do i arrive to a number between 0.015 and 0.020 ?
Are you expecting them to generate an image for every possible number of lines? It’s user-customizable and depends entirely on the step size and the value range.
For example, between 0.01 and 0.02 with a step of 0.005, you’d get a line at 0.015 – printing numbers for every line simply isn’t feasible.
This is the print i got, i didn’t see anywhere a possibility to configure it to be the same on screen.
I even thought it would ask me to reprint with other tolerance close to the one that was best for me, because of course you can’t print every number, but you can help pinpoint.
I was expecting something more like , “choose the closest number that feel correct to you” and once i choosed it it would tell me that it can go a step further and go one decimal point below the previous.
The lines without numbers is the number in between the 2 you see. Let’s say there’s a line at 0.020, a no number line, and then another line at 0.030. The blank line would then be 0.025
if you read the first message, my issue was that on the support page, they show an image with a setting of 0.017, so yes if you have a line between 0.01 and 0.02 and the answer is not 0.015 but 0.017 there is my issue.
but another guy mentioned that you can do the test with your own parameter and limit, my complain is that they should add that explanation or change the image provided on the automatic test because it is confusing to see those number when the test they give you doesn’t not mention them.
my brain work like that, if get ask a question about 1 or 0, seeing a 7 on the response sheet is hell of confusing.
that was my issue at the start and the lack of explanation
ergo bambu need to remake the explanation on this test
I’m confused. Are you saying the line between 0.010 and 0.020 is 0.017? Because that’s incorrect lol. The line in between 2 numbers is the middle point between those 2 numbers.
Yes, you can change the test parameters. Change the start value to 0.0, the end/finish value to 0.08, and the value step to 0.002. You’ll get a much broader view and a more accurate result.
There is an automatic calibration test for this parameter. You don’t have to print the lines if you’re using a 0.4mm nozzle.
