Ok not, result is not salvageable at all.
Retrying with Hex Pattern as structure for support.
So if you slice it for the P1S, and then swap out the start/end gcode for H2D - does the issue still exist?
1 Like
This thread shows that the mods suck. Perfect example of trolling.
Exactly, you’re posting exactly the right thing as the right person. When people think alike, they don’t really have to be great minds 
All the discussions from others were initially very polite and civilized, until someone started to SHOUT AT ANYONE WHO SUGGESTS ANYTHING, AND TROLL EVERY OTHER POST WITH HIS AI DETECTION NOT WORKING.
1 Like
I can’t download the test file you posted.
As for the Photo - To tackle this geometry/ curve not printing as nicely as your other printers (caused by most likely by a temporary issue with H2D/ BAMBU STUDIO) and save myself a lot of irritation I would try 2 things:
- Supports settings: Expand the supports by 1-2mm, make at least 3 top interface layers with zero spacing, Reduce the object -support gap to 0.12mm
- Add sacrificial part in the model that would act as a support/support interface. something like this:
Once it is a separate object you can do so many things to try to improve the result, move it up/down, change materials/ironig/etc. You can even extend the part to the bottom of the model, make it ome/2walls and just use sparse infil if you want to get rid of the supports all together. Yes, it requires few minutes of modeling but why not to try it?
I’ve attached the file if you want to play with it.
test_abs_h2d.3mf (211.6 KB)
2 Likes
Nope, couldn’t regenerate the model in a viable way
Possible Solution (need to repeat it more than 50 times before I call it permanent) : Use honeycomb turned 45degrees structure pattern. Result was immaculate.
Will be back once I finish the repeatability test.
This is an amazing reply, I hope your effort wasn’t wasted. I know who to go to when I need help! 