In Bambu Studio:how to find and set "Outer Wall Seam: None "

I am trying to get “invisible seams” on the outer wall of my Tubular print. Co-Pilot suggests the following (as well as other settings) but I CANNOT FIND "Outer Wall Seam: None "

My printer is X2D with a MicroSwusss HF nozzle, using Bambu ASA filament

See CoPilot advice points below:

3. Z‑Seam (outer wall seam fully suppressed)

Print Settings → Quality → Z Seam

  • Z Seam Type: Aligned

  • Z Seam Position: Back

  • Outer Wall Seam: None ← this is the magic switch

  • Seam Gap: 0.00 mm

This forces the seam onto the inner wall only, producing a perfectly smooth outer surface.

There’s no such setting in Bambu Studio, your AI is hallucinating, sorry, or perhaps referring to the wrong slicer (I don’t know which, if any, have those settings). There’s no “seam type” setting either, “Aligned” and “Back” are both in the “seam position” choices. There’s a scarf seam type, but that’s a different animal altogether.

-Max

If your part doesn’t have sharp corners to hide the seam in, then the Scarf Seam is the best alternative.

In this wiki section you wil find more information about seams including the Scarf seam: Seam settings | Bambu Lab Wiki

Forget your AI responses. In this case it’s garbage.

Dont’t use AI to do your thinking for you, exhibit 1,763,994,753,836.

LOL your AI is hallucinating so hard that it’s telling you literal lies

I’ve learned to always follow up a question to AI with “are you sure about that”.

I love how Scam Altmal and Wario Amodei want trillions of our dollars because they’re totally competent stewards of the AI industry, but they can’t program their chatbots to verify their own work, so we have to do it for them.

Strength wise on a cylinder, setting the seam to “random” might be better. You will have little seam dots on the surface but never a straight seam along the part.

A quick tip: Copilot has a great feature - it always shows you the source next to its AI response. It’s something you should always use.

Copilot is actually a relatively good option among AI tools because it directly displays the source so you can verify it. Something that other AIs don’t do.

I recreated your scenario, and in that case, you would have come across the exact source of the “none” reference: The AI messed that up in my case too, but clicking next to the text on “source” takes you to this image: This makes it clear that “none” is valid for another function.


So always - and I mean always - click on source!