It should all be 1 model & profile.
As for the download & likes…I assume if you download 1 of them you would download all of them to have a complete collection.
There is guideline for this. The first 5 in your screenshot should be one submission. They can be on 5 different plates, or the variations can be presented as 5 different print profiles.
Also note that all the models on your screenshot have the Exclusive Program icon. I think this is to grab some quick points while the program is early in the pilot phase and penalties are not assessed.
I thought there was a rule being pushed through in October that meant you weren’t supposed to have lots of profiles of the same or recolored items, clearly whole separate uploads is the same?
This approach is just a way for someone to get 5x the points for that first 50 or so downloads (if they are legit at all)
There are people with hundreds of virtually the same item but an entirely different upload. I get it if the model is strikingly different but this ain’t it chief
Wait until you come across models with V1, v2, v2.1, v2.2, v3 and so on… small changes… new upload. If a user sees a version 2 why would it go and download version 1? Why not put them all under the same model, different profiles named accordingly?
Nah…let’s upload for the points. And the point rewards are what are killing makerworld. I though it was a good idea but now i wonder…
Damn I missed out the short time expiry for getting my Generic User name. Got to admit nesting them like this is preferred than 254 Models out there in the wild
I reported these last night and another set of Uno cards the guy has.
I was not aware of this thread at the time.
This was the point I made to MW.
I always add each reported model to a private category to monitor MW’s response. After checking this morning, all 5 poker chips had gone, and all 15 Uno cards had also left the building.