Hello,
Is it on your todo list to create a new hub that allows you to have more than 4 AMS on a single printer? So that you can have as many colours as possible
Thanks in advance!
Hello,
Is it on your todo list to create a new hub that allows you to have more than 4 AMS on a single printer? So that you can have as many colours as possible
Thanks in advance!
I thought about buying a fifth to swap-out with #4 on occasion. #4 sits on top of the X1 and itās easy to get to. I often change colors in that one. The other three are on a 3-tier shelf and harder to access. However, the $350 luxury is harder to take than just swapping a roll or two.
Just curious but what do you need more than 16 filaments for?
Thereāre more than 16 colors. And that doesnāt even include the different filament types. (PLA. PETG, etc., etc.)
If BL really wanted to, I bet it wouldnāt take much coding to daisy chain multiple AMS Hubs.
A daisy chain solution would bring the overall reliability down. An 8-port hub would be preferable.
The AMS units are daisy chained now with the power/signal cables. The hub just handles the filament but yeah, a larger hub would work too. It still takes some software/firmware changes to deal with the increase.
Edit: Iām sure an upgraded power supply would be needed too.
I would like this too as ideally if AMSs were cheap enough and stackable I would like to keep at least 40 filaments āonlineā.
Would be fairly easy to use something like the AMS Lite print head top hub to allow an extra 3 PTFEs to go into the existing AMS hub, plus technically you could daily chain an extra AMS or electrically switch it in and out. So probably just a software limitation. Power I guess might be an issue - if for example you insert filaments into all 5 AMSs at the same time will they all power up their motors at the same time - or does it do them one at a time across all AMSs?
For remote printing with a wide choice of colours and filament types. Without having to change each time by hand (and waste time going to the printer, etc.).
My printers are not where I live.
The AMS units are all powered by the printer. When you turn-on the printer, all AMS units are powered. The spool discovery occurs one at a time starting with the first AMS and continues for all of them for any that have filament preloaded. Thatās why I turned discovery offāIām using only a couple of BL filaments. It was taking too long to āreadā the nonexistent tags on all the spools. When I turn my printer on, I want to print.
It may not be possible without a redesign. I donāt know that though but in computers/electronics 16 is pretty magical and a lot of logic stuff is limited to 4, 8, or 16 āthingsā.
I donāt know their circuit but generally being powers of 2, they could have designed for a maximum of 16 where the next level would be 32 and probably unlikely it would be a serious consideration.
If everything is programmable, though, maybe there isnāt a limit except by the communications protocol. Maybe thatās all that would need to change to get another address bit if itās not already there?
But it may not be possible depending on how the circuitry in the AMS is done.
Perhaps, but if itās a single character flag you can only have 16 possible bits (0-F). With two characters, the next level wouldnāt be 32. It would be 16 x 16 or 256.
would need a seperate powered hub.