Wow! Talk about hyperbole! When did any EULA come out and say the company can kill you? Maim? Hit you with a hammer? Break a finger? This is not an “extreme” example; rather, it is not an example of anything but a farce and fearmongering.
What in the EULA for Bambu products is illegal? And what about clauses in contracts that say if one part is illegal, it does not affect the other parts of the contract that are not found to be illegal/unlawful?
Do you not think that EULA language has been litigated so that when used, the producers of the EULA can feel comfortable that it will withstand a challenge in court? Do you know of any cases in the last 10 years that have held that a EULA or part of one was held to be invalid, illegal, unlawful, void, or voidable?