Searching for comparative information between the two. The tough+ isn’t in the main pages data sheet yet.
They haven’t published any data yet. In the filament industry, terms like “Tough,” “High Flow (HF),” or “PLA+” are purely marketing labels - there are no standards or accepted definitions behind them. Even if a datasheet appears, don’t trust it; it will almost certainly be marketing doublespeak, not meaningful specifications.
It is available in the EU store https://store.bblcdn.eu/s8/default/f0874452d01249dba4ab6fc68ca972e4/BambuPLA_Tough_TechnicalData_Sheet_(2).pdf
Very nice, do you have the PLA cf ones too?
Yes
I did make a comparison chart a while ago here:
I have updated it since (except for PLA Tough) but do not seem to have posted it yet. Will do when back at my laptop.
& 
Here’s my filament TDS data. Now also with PLA Tough+.
There may be errors in it, but I hope they are few.
FDM Filament Data.3mf (287,9 KB)
FDM Filament Comparison.3mf (302,0 KB)
Since I can not upload pdf’s here, you’ll need to change the file extension back from 3mf to pdf.
&
Thank you very much. The impact strength of the tough+ seems unbelievable. 915%
Also surprised it performs worst in most compared to straight PLA
1 Like
Well, it’s what it is tailored for.
PLA is actually quite tough to beat on an individual number basis. And when trying to improve a particular property, it is quite common that other properties need to be sacrificed. Here, they seem to have succesfully traded stiffness for impact strength.
BW,
Eno