I almost never check community, so I’m glad I spotted this. Reposting here since that’s where most of us are more active.
5 Likes
Hello! I would like to purchase a commercial license for a product on the website. But PayPal isn’t supported in my country of residence. Therefore, I’m wondering if there’s an alternative payment method other than PayPal, say, a credit card, or something else you can offer, so I can use the license? Best regards, Narman. Turkey.
I see Woogie is on the post relitigating his arguments that it is unfair he got caught (because he admitted it) using someone else work in his model be a he couldn’t be bothered to design his own hinge. The story was later change to pretend that wasn’t what he said first time.
Back to the topic, proactive must be the way to go, this failure to act and their hoping it will go away hasn’t worked.
The timeline proof is an interesting request, as some CAD packages have no such function.
I assume hundreds or thousands of lines of OpenSCAD will be sufficient evidence.
You need to explain what product, what license and other useful information as this comment does not appear related to the posted topic.
Good link.
Can @MakerWorld provide some clarification to the following questions?
- Most of us don’t do screen recording while prototype. For Fusion users, there can be 3 ways to show authorship
A) a screenshot of the workspace showing all the versions on the left and the timeline at the bottom of the screenshot
B) send MW a public link to the project file
C) export the project file to send to MW.
Which of the above is acceptable as evidence? If Option C is the only way, then what format should the exported file be?
- Do watermarks on photos really work? Are there some good practices or tips on how to make watermarks more difficult for scammers to get around?
1 Like
@Makerworld can you clarify this? I can understand how this would work with exclusive models since you could argue that you are defending your exclusive hosting rights, but what about non-exclusive models? For non-exclusive models a competing platform should just say, rightly, that Bambu Lab isn’t the creator/owner and can’t file a complaint.
So is this new “Fast-Track Reporting for Creators” process just for exclusive models or not?