Share your feedback and help us improve!

Here is some feedback I’ll be sending y’all a million different ways lol I really enjoy the AMS 2 Pro and the convenience it adds to filament management. However, it’s frustrating that the drying function can only be started via the printer’s touchscreen, even though the AMS 2 is fully networked and reports its drying status and environmental data to Handy and Studio.

It would greatly improve the user experience if we could start (and stop) the AMS drying cycle remotely from the Bambu Handy app and/or Studio. For those of us with printers in another room, it’s inconvenient to physically go to the printer just to turn drying on.

Please consider adding this functionality in a future firmware and app update, it would make the AMS Pro feel much more like the “smart” accessory it’s marketed as.

Thank you for your hard work and for listening to community feedback!

1 Like

Two feature requests for painting a multi-color print

Painting Feature Request 1: Can we have a sliced view to paint the inside of closed cavities and/or areas with limited access?

Painting Feature Request 2: Can we paint straight lines like how GIMP draws straight lines with the pencil while using the shift key?

These would be high impact using common, established methods! For consideration, please let me know if you have any questions or need help testing

1 Like

Consider NOT giving printers similar names (A1/A1-mini). In MakerWorld, searching for A1 printer files will also return A1-mini results thus forcing A1 owners (or vice versa) to do a lot more scrolling. Also, there’s been a couple of times I thought I printed something for the A1 only to find out it was for the Mini.

I have a feeling that you’ve been review bombed on Trustpilot. I know that the wait time for the response could be so much faster, but once you get onto the issue, it always gets resolved quickly, at least in my cases. But I bet I’m not the only one with that experience.

1 Like

I’m sure the low rating is from people who don’t like waiting a long time after they put in their ticket. I find that customer support is pretty quick and knows exactly what to do. They also simplify it for someone who is new like me. :rofl:

1 Like

Some of us just know our way around and are rather dissatisfied with such generic AI answers every 5 days :wink:

I wish there was an easier way to reach out to support for issues on makerworld. Unless I am missing something I can not find a support section specifically for makerworld.

Log into the MW account, there is the Support Tickets.

4 Likes

Omg, thank you! I didnt know that tab even existed!

[

I have had nothing but the best support…

](Bambu Lab reviewed by customer on 8/10/2025)

I have had nothing but the best support I could want from The Bambu Lab support.
They have gone above and beyond with trying to help get me back printing after a problem with my A1 printer .I have seen the same Issue that i have had with a printer in Europe I am in Australia
The spares to repair it have been shipped as soon as they got the report ticket .
I suppose that it could happen with any type of electrical appliance.
Well done Bambu Support. I have bought a second A! thanks to the great support I received

1 Like

How sad to hear that – you really hit the nail on the head with what’s been going through my mind.

On top of that, I should just mention that in order to file a complaint, you first have to register. I’ve never encountered this requirement with any other company I’ve ever done business with in my enter life. (Exception: Aliexpress where you order for 2-10 euros, but that is also the customer service you should expect from Bambu)

The X1C was worth it – I never had any trouble with it – but all the other machines only have too small of a technological edge for me to ever go through that process again.

1 Like

The A1 Mini ist my first Printer and I’m completely happy :blush: I’m really surprised what a 3d printer for that money can do…all the automatic calibration stuff und the eco system usw…my first prints also looking great und i had zero issues…pretty sure I will buy the non mini too…very soon :smile:

25 years ago I was the lead tech for the Unix customer support group at IBM Research. I answered the hard questions. After that I worked as a business process and security consultant until I retired. I feel that I know whereof I speak.

If you measure the time that a ticket stays open, you will get tickets closed quickly. If you measure time to initial interaction, more emphasis will be put there - and in both cases, the actual customer experience will suffer.

YOU GET WHAT YOU MEASURE…and so you need to be very careful about what you measure. If what you measure does not have a direct hook into “did the customer get their question answered”, and were they happy with the interaction, you are measuring the wrong thing.

Lazy managers want to measure simple things, “How long was it until an answer was entered for the question?” “How many questions are open?” or even worse, “How much time does a consultant spend on answering a question,” or “how many questions does a consultant answer per day,” or “how many times a day does the consultant refer an answer to a higher level of technical support”?

Those things are easy to measure - and measuring them will make your answer quality go down. Measuring any of the last three will make your quality go down quickly.

Measuring the quality of customer service is actually very difficult. Arguably, the way to do it is to actually look at some or all of the individual interactions and determining if the consultant is attempting to solve customer problems or make their numbers look good.

I have trouble finding the area of support I need and sometimes there seems to be no area that corresponds with what I need.

I put in tickets and get responses but have no idea that I have gotten those responses. You should text and e-mail.

I really wish I could just make a ticket by e-mail and get my responses that way. Having to use an unfamiliar scheme to ender tickets makes the system weird to me…especially because there is more than one web portal - but there is only one Bambu Labs.

Responses seem slow. I put in a ticket, check a couple times, stop checking, get a response, I don’t see it, and then the ticket is closed on me. Hope your stats look good because you close tickets automatically.

I give you a clear description of what is going on. You tell me, “Send me a video.”

Are you telling me that you think I am lying or that you simply don’t understand english that I thought was clear? Or are you just trying to put an obstacle in my way that will make me less likely to actually follow through with my support request.

Every time you tell a customer that they have used your system improperly and put a request in the wrong place, that is your failure, not theirs. Every time you ask a customer for more documentation where the explanation is already complete, that is a brush off, and is your failure.

I would not have rated you as high as 2.5.

There should be a single point where customers enter tickets. While the customers might do some presorting because they want to, there should be an “other” category and any reassignment of tickets should be done transparently to the user.

Tickets should only be able to be closed by the user. If this makes Bambu’s stats look bad, they can change the ticket’s status to answered (and if the answer is determined to be a “brush off” like asking a customer for info they have already provided, asking for information it is easier for someone from Bambu to determine than the customer, asking for information that has absolutely no bearing to the actual question etc., then the time in “answered” status should be counted as an unanswered waiting question.

As an example, my wife noted that the fact that Bambu Suite does not deal with text on a path means that you have to convert everything you bring in from, for example, inkscape where you have had to do simply to put text on a path and then convert it to paths rather than text, makes Bambu Suite more or less useless. She is right, and moving an SVG from one to the other means that the two programs interpret the SVGs differently. When I tried to google, it pointed me here…and that got you this rant.

The user should have a single place to enter their ticket. Again, any classification that they do should be optional. Making the user sort their tickets makes your system opaque because of the way that stuff is entered.

I have been 3d printing on and off for 5 years or so, someone broke in and vandalized all my printers. I bought a Creality and an H2D…I can get Creality parts from Amazon with one day shipping if I have to replace hotend parts because I got a blob of death. i spent money on an H2D and can’t figure out how to buy stuff for it because your web site jumps all around and I have no idea of who or how to complain.

4 Likes

That’s the ticket portal. Nowadays in many companies, the only way to send a request is to go through a ticket system. If you send an email or call someone, their response is to ask you to put it into the ticket system. The queue is based on time of entry, so the sooner one gets it in, the better.

Not necessarily. Some users may never close it. It’s normal for tickets to be closed after the user has not responded to notifications about the ticket for a certain time.

In my experience, the following two things can help to get a quicker solution. 1. provide a very detail description of the problem. Use photos or videos if applicable can help a lot. 2. follow the instructions exactly as given. For example, if they ask you to reboot the system, then do it right there, Don’t say that you had done it many times. Just do it. If they ask you for further info, be it photo or video, give it to them. You objective is to get the problem resolved as quickly as you can. Following their instructions make it easier to get that.

1 Like

@DWdesigns I get where you’re coming from, and you’re right - good descriptions and following instructions can help in many support setups. But that advice misses the bigger issue that @shellhopper nailed: Bambu’s support model isn’t about solving problems, it’s about protecting their metrics. And when the system itself is broken, no amount of perfect ticket-writing will change the outcome.

From day one in 2023, the pattern was obvious: “send us your logs.” Simple question about Handy connection time? “Send us your logs.” Hardware issue already described in detail? “Send us your logs.” That’s not support - it’s free data collection, offloading product testing onto paying customers. Add in auto-closing tickets, multiple portals, and repeated demands for info already provided, and what you get is exactly what @Shellhopper called out: transactional friction designed to serve Bambu, not the customer.

I’ve managed a support call center. I know the difference between a system that helps customers and one that hides behind process. Bambu’s model is a one-way street - dictating rules, draining value, and giving nothing back. That’s not just bad support, it’s the behavior of a market bully. And history shows what happens to bullies: eventually the courts, or a disruptive competitor, come along and hands them their ass.

2 Likes

My one experience with Bambu support (warranty claim for warped bed) showed that they were not actually reading my problem description, looking at the included pictures, or examining the included log.

I had been aware that many printers produced at the same time had the same defect, and that early replacement parts were also defective, so I had waited until I saw reports of good parts being shipped before I entered a ticket. I followed all instructions exactly, with logs, all my attempts to compensate for the problem, pictures and a short video of my measurement methods to show the problem.

Their first response was a canned response referring me to the Wiki for general maintenance (already completed and reported on the initial ticket), showing no understanding of the actual problem.
Their second response was instructions to tram the bed (already completed and reported on the initial ticket), which I did again just to comply with their request, along with sending another log.
Their third response was a request for a log (already included in the initial ticket and after re-re-tramming). After I rather heatedly pointed out that they already had two logs, they finally sent a log to their “technical” group who verified the problem three days later and a new part was finally shipped.

The time differences meant that each message to or from Bambu took an entire day. With weekends, it took more than a week for them to even pass the logs to someone who could interpret them.

Once the replacement was authorized, a shipping label was created, but it took a further three days for the package to reach the carrier.

So, while your two tips to get a prompt resolution might be effective with some companies, they cannot overcome Bambu’s disinterest in customer support.

4 Likes

The tips that I shared worked for me across multiple companies, including Bambu Lab. I am sorry that your one and only experience with Bambu was different.

You did delineate the back-and-forths with enough detail that can be actually helpful to discuss and see what could have been done better.

They asked you to do the maintenance steps and tram the bed and provide the second log after tramming. I think all these are standard tech support operations. It’s not that they didn’t read your description of what you had done, but more likely they are like other tech supports, have learned their lessons not to trouble-shoot based on what customers said they did or didn’t do. So yes, they could ask you to go through all these things that you clearly said you had done, simply because their protocol requires them to go through them.

I do see a problem with their 3rd response asking for a log when you had sent in the new log after bed tramming. This is where BL can improve. Perhaps BL can set a limit on how many times the screening team (if there is one, as you suggested) interact with a user before handing it over to the real tech support members.

But you are the one who is not satisfied with the experience, so your suggestions will be more relevant. What would you have liked BL to do in your case?

I expected Bambu support to evaluate the contents of my ticket, to examine the log included with that ticket (per their requirements), to confirm the problem, and to ship the necessary part promptly.

The warped bed problem was a common one for printers produced in beginning January '23, and it was May before they began shipping reasonably flat replacements. I waited until June to avoid getting another warped bed. By then, they should have been very familiar with both the issue and the solution.

I went to great lengths to be sure all the facts and evidence were clearly presented in that original ticket. I included measurements, videos showing my measurement procedures, photos of the obvious problems caused in actual prints, and details of unsuccessful attempts to work around the problem.

Their responses include irrelevant suggestions and instructions to perform steps that I had already completed, indicating that they paid no attention to the information in the original ticket. When they finally decided they need someone to look at a log I had to remind them that they already had two. Making me jump through their hoops for over a week did not change or add to the data they had to confirm the problem, data they had available in the initial ticket.

I have worked in customer service and technical services for decades. If your protocol is not to trouble-shoot based on what customers said they did or didn’t do.” you have a very bad protocol.

Do you assume customers are lying? Or incompetent, unable to describe what they see and experience? Either assumption is insulting and does nothing to resolve the problem. Maybe they lack knowledge, maybe what they have done is not appropriate or reasonable, maybe their results need to be confirmed by your own tests. But what a customer has done and their results are all part of the description of the problem. You cannot understand the issue without that information and you are not listening to your customer. How can you hope to satisfy them?

If the customer provides data that you specifically required, data generated by your product, and then you fail to evaluate that data, you are proving you are not interested in solving the problem.

3 Likes

I exclusively have received excellent products and support from Bambu Lab. For my part, I only wish you’ll keep that up and don’t get complacent. Very happy customer.

2 Likes
2 Likes