Hi,
How do I slow down the outer wall speed for a part profile with intricate geometry?
I am getting a constant outer wall speed that tends to round those edges.
I am not looking to slow down the outer wall for the whole print, only where it’s needed.
Your tips are appreciate it.
Thank you
I would add a height range modifier, specify the from and to heights and then select the modifier from the object list and change the parameters for that section or sections you add.
Right click a model and add the range modifier, select it in the objects list to change its values.
Thank you for your reply.
What I am really looking for is a well defined text. I don’t want to slow down the whole layer speed in height range modifier as it clearly shows in the final print.
What I am looking for is to match how Prusa Slicer does it.
You can can see that around the edges of the text, the slicer slows down (half the outer wall speed) automatically for a better more defined text ( shown in the dark green part)
Any ideas how to do this beside the height range modifier?
You can see that the text is much better on the actual print in Prusa.
These are usually indications of a mal-calibration of your filament. More specifically, I’d be looking at flow rate first and then pressure advance. Did you manually calibrate your filament?
Can you print a Voron Cube so that we can see a model that we can reproduce or upload your 3MF to this thread.
Here’s what I am referring to, I posted this on another thread with similar issues.
Here’s an exaggerated affect where pressure advance has really ruined a print.
Here’s another example.
Both threads might have some insights for you.
Here’s the cube I am referring to. See the other threads for how-to.
Thank you for your reply.
Yes, I already did the “flow dynamics line calibration” the K was 0.045.
K= 0.045 had the best consistent line.
After I saw your post I redid it with the pattern. The difference between the corners of K value 0 to 0.1 in 0.05 increments were almost negligible. If I had to look at the overall line consistency without over extrusion I would pick a K value of 0.015.
Clearly the two methods yields different K values. Are they supposed to be the same?
Let me offer this one word of advice. Forget about K values. They are blunt instruments. Make the switch to Orca if you aren’t already there and use their baked-in calibration routines. Here’s two videos that I feel do a great job describing how to maximize precision calibration.
While this is still imperfect, it’s a long shot better than the regular Bambu Studio. Oh yeah… Orca lets you bypass the MakerWorld promotional garbage and land right on the preview page, a nice quality of life enhancement indeed.
Thanks for the recomendations. I used Orca slicer before then switched back to Bambu.
I will give Orca a try again.
