The Way Forward - An Open Letter to Bambu Lab & Dr. Tao

Dr. Tao,

Your customers are upset.

They feel like they’ve had functionality taken away in the name of security. And, the security itself is not well implemented, so it makes people suspect other motives are at play - even if your intentions are good.

With the changes you propose, I imagine you are thinking something along the lines of:

“Only a tiny percentage of our users want direct, unfettered control of their machines. Most people just want the machine to work - every time, like an appliance. We need to protect that goal.”

You are 100% right.

But, there is another way to look at this.

Though you have succeeded brilliantly in making an easy-to use “just works” experience – which is no small feat – the market for 3D printers is still small compared to nearly any other appliance or tool. Because of this, a very large percentage of new printer users turn to 3D printing experts, influencers, and respected forum commenters for their recommendations before buying. You need goodwill from “the small minority” for continued success.

As a successful business person myself, I fear that if you stick to your current approach – which feels to many people like you are simply trying to soothe with soft public-relations speak – your problems will spiral and you will loose all credibility. At that point, a successful company can become hated virtually overnight.

It is time to let go of your current approach - even if you feel you are right. It is not possible at this point to convince customers of your rightness. This isn’t about figuring out the right thing to say or the right way to say it – it is about doing the right thing.

You need to start over and formulate a new plan.

Begin by listening, really listening to what your advanced customers are asking for. Then, offer a supported, full featured “open mode” – but don’t worry that this will lead to the chaos of a hard-to-use product. If implemented well, the vast majority of your customers can and will simply use the “normal mode” with all of the restrictions and safeguards you deem necessary for secure ease-of-use.

Only through action can you show that you understand what people want and reclaim the huge reservoir of goodwill you have already lost. If the technically savvy folks can have open access to the machines they buy and own, this will bring out their interest, their creativity, their sense that the’ve been listened to, and their respect for your bold market-leading action. You will have an army of unpaid representatives selling your new printers for you.

Take this as an opportunity, a moment in time to set an example for the rest of the industry.

Please - don’t rely on a communications specialist, or public relations person to provide the next customer communication. The person to deliver the new plan for the way forward is you Dr. Tao.

Respectfully,
Joe

157 Likes

I like this, but I don’t think he is the one who chose to do this.

6 Likes

Current information:

3 Likes

He is the one who can choose not to do it.

12 Likes

I read the Verge article this morning. There is very little new here, and still fits into the category of “If we talk more, explain more, say the right words, we will turn the tide.” I 'd like them to understand that isn’t true. It is hard to step back and say “This was the wrong thing. We know that now. We hear you and we are going to do a different thing.” In fact, it is often the hardest thing and many people/companies would rather try to save face and ride the same train until it crashes then step back, be contrite, change course. But…but…on occasion, rarely, people and companies are bold, and admitting they are on the wrong course does more good for them then they could have immagined.

27 Likes

Why the supposedly surely-will-come demise of BL is so big a concern that leads to this kind of repeated posting everywhere though?

If BL is crushed because of this, it will mean the only closed-system 3D printer company is dead. The open-source companies will claim back the market share and produce the open-source printers that everyone can tinker to their hearts’ content. Isn’t that what people who have been complaining want?

4 Likes

I purchased a piece of hardware akin to a toaster. Maybe it can burn my house down because it’s connected to my local (secured) network. That’s my issue. It’s exponentially more likely to be a security issue if it has to talk to Toaster Co’s cloud to perform its function.

Toaster Co is not going to do a better job of securing my network and devices, it will only be a gatekeeper for it’s own business interests under the guise of security.

If I do not have absolute control over my toaster directly over my local network without 3rd party interference or cloud/internet connectivity, that toaster (several in this case) will be gone and I will not purchase any more ■■■■ from the Toaster Company.

That simple.

32 Likes

Answer my question though.

If the demise of BL is good for people who have been complaining, why do these same people keep the non-stop complaining trying to stop BL from going down the road of demise?

2 Likes

I don’t think most people are complaining, personally. That is pejorative. Nor do I think people who are criticizing BBLs current choices want them to fail.

I think the passion partly comes from the fact that BBL has done so many things right. When they started a few years ago they put out the best software/hardware combination bar-none. A full generation ahead really.

It is like watching a good friend make bad decisions.

13 Likes

Then you don’t buy it. No one will force you to.
That simple,

So all these 24/7 everywhere crying foul and threatening, are just friendly advices to BL? Common sense would say they are not.

5 Likes

Using this (faulty) assumption, how would you explain that the “people who have been complaining” got a Bambu Lab printer in the first place?

What people are asking for is basic competence, an absence of malice, and compliance with laws and regulations.

But sure, lesson learned. My second printer will be fully open-source.

11 Likes

I understand your pain. If I was using my printer to make toast like you, I’d probably be upset too if Bambu wouldn’t let me toast my toast the way I want to toast my toast. What if they decided to only let you toast their bread? What if that bread was keto bread? I’d be pretty mad, since I much prefer multi grain.

Couldn’t help myself. I’ve never seen anyone equate a 3d printer as advanced as a Bambu to a toaster. It’s like equating a tesla to a battery.

6 Likes

IF BL has broken the law, take them to the court. The 24/7 non-stop crying foul here won’t do it.

4 Likes

I’m not here to discuss or defend what others may have said or what they meant. I simply wanted to offer my personal thoughts to BBL on how to move forward and restore trust.

5 Likes

Before something goes in front of a court, and even after, the involved parties often try to work out an amicable solution. Anyway, afaiu some people are already in contact with EU regulators. Personally, I will wait until the dust settles.

Note that I already have the printer at home and would much prefer Bambu Lab to just bring on board competent developers that can solve the security problems properly.

6 Likes

I like Danish whole grain bread. Very hearty. Tough to toast.

5 Likes

Sorry, this got off topic, but damn that looks like my kind of bread!

1 Like

Ok - last one…I’ve made this recipe and it is very good:

4 Likes

A Tesla is mostly a battery plus an iPad on wheels. Also analogy.

4 Likes

I got to call it a night, but here’s a few straight simple points.

1 To people who want open-source printers, BL’s demise is exactly what they need. Stop these non-stop crying foul everywere. Let BL die.

  1. If BL has broken the law, take them to the court, already.

  2. If people don’t want to buy any more BL printers, or dont’ want to have anymore relationship with it, just don’t. No one will force you to.

1 Like