Let’s say, in theory, that “safety” applies here (it doesn’t btw), how would you explain this answer bambu spokes person gave:
There are industry-strandard secure authentication methods that ensure security without the need of any proprietary middleman authentication app. Bambu rejected such methods.
This reasoning is invalid. It’s a consumer trap: There’s shady stuff in the TOS? “Oh don’t worry, that’s just legal bs for future, company won’t go evil!” Company does stupid stuff like this? “Oh, you didn’t read TOS, did you? It’s on you!”