there are users changing there license frome share alike to standard digital license files… then report our models and get them taken down… the thing is most of the times those users did a remix from the other user and must share this license 1. ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
same as the original… then if we make an appeal well makerworld asks us to provide as much info as possible and only have one chance to appeal per model ? how can we provide as much info as possible if we only have 300 characters and share links in this 300 characters ??
i harrased and bully you ??? hmm I dont see where i did this, you actually reported the model i did remixed and say i did only a skirt around it when it was more then just that, you also revoke your model wich isnt aloud this is why i personally messaged you. first time you posted the model you had missing parts and did not mentioned that i couldnt add the other files to it wich i tought it should have been there in the first place. sorry if you get mad but its true you cannot revoke these therms and you did then reported me ? for what ? jealousy ?
Also it is not a fight if I come to you and ask you to modify your model with actually the parts that you are missing in your model as I did added it to my print profile. you had nothing written in there saying that you are not alowed to do so. you just got mad at me for asking you a simple question my dude. and then you make it look like im the bad guy in here but I simply remixed your model and you didnt like it as to you it is not enough work that i personally did ? but to me i still did 1h or more of work on it so its not just simple task and i also had to test it and print it. thank you
in any case you based your model off a remixed licensed and need to apply same therms as everyone i think. licensed are there for reasons. if people say this is not alowed because you want to create or recreate your version of the license that doesnt work
This is the reason you take a topic from normal to muted. 
1 Like
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
The licensor DID CHANGE HIS FREEDOMS ! wich is not alowed !
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
here is a full version of the license
@BambuLab so we can change licensing now ? put them from common attridbution to standard digital license files ? while we are remixing files from others ?? but when I personally make a model and remix its not okay ? when I appeal or report my issue it fails but when this happens its all okay ??? Sorry but I personally dont think we are alowed to change someones license even if we type in this is a remix of this person you know. ? there are licensing for reasons to share and trade. thank you
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
THIS IS WHAT THE LICENSING INCLUDES! so if I make a remix of it… even if you believe its not a good remix enough I think I can still make it as it clearly says here that I can remix it and then post it back again as long as I follow the licensing. thank you
@BambuLab so we can do whatever we want now with the licensing ? as i see my reports are all being rejected day after day … so free for all for everyone i guess ??
My model doesn’t violate any license of the models in that screenshot you posted. They all fall under the CC BY license. All that license requires from me is attribution. I’m under no obligation to allow remixing of that model, regardless of how you feel about it.
On a related note, you need to understand that I had your upload taken down not because of any licensing conflict, but because adding supports to a model is not remixing. That upload was being taken down regardless of what license was on my model.
The sooner you accept these facts, the better off you’ll be. Move on with your life.
you are putting the license to standard digital license file on a model I did a remix. you believe the remix was not good enough and changed your license. but the model you took from has this license and you dont follow it : 1. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. (WICH YOU DID)
it was not adding support to the model at all this had nothing to do with adding supports to the model I did a remix and you tought it was just not great enough as a kit card and with all parts included, but it was still a remix of it and I still had to take time to cad it to. The thing is that your model was actually with a license that you were not alowed to revoke wich you did.
Sorry, but your interpretation of the license is wrong. What you’re thinking of is
" SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms."
SA doesn’t exist on the license of any of the models I remixed, therefore I’m allowed to change the license on mine. Keep reporting my models all you want, none of them violate any license.
As far as why your upload was taken down, here is the actual report I submitted…
If you want further proof that is why your upload was taken down, then go get another random model, any one, it doesn’t matter. Add supports to that model and upload it as a kit card. I’ll report it and we’ll see whether it gets taken down or not.
remixing the model and adding files to it is not adding supports in the slicer. thank you
also i dont see why you revoke your terms on the model and changed the license as it clearly says up that you canot revoke these freedoms. ? am i missing something ?
Yes, you are missing something, the point.
I’m done trying to explain it to you.
Submit all the reports you want, I don’t care. They’ll all be rejected.
1 Like
ok if you say so im pretty sure you were wrong, not liking the fact that i remixed your model in a way that you dont like is not a good excuse for removing my remix, changing your license is not permited and im pretty sure im right on this point. Also saying that I only added supports on the model when it was clearly more then that and you didnt like me organizing all the parts on the plate like this as a kit card and jointing all them togheter is not following the licensing terms and then changing your licensing therms and saying that i only added supports on the model was not okay I believe. Thank you
Ah I see that you too have problems with Dr Operator, he did the same thing to me, I made a remix of one of this model which was under CC BY NC license and a few days later I got caught a stike, when I returned to his model he had changed the license to Standard
His other technique is to delete these models as soon as someone posts a profile that is more successful than his
Well, let’s see here…
I’ve had my MINI 13 models reuploaded and subsequently removed by three different people. Kenny reuploaded Groot and AT-ST as kit cards, cwfflutter reuploaded each one of the weapons in my weapon pack as individuals and Eskalibure reuploaded Groot.
You’re obviously not Kenny and between Eskalibure and cwfflutter, only Eskalibure has uploaded a profile to one of my designs so you’re clearly Eskalibure.
Just like Kenny, you need to read up on what a remix is. Your upload was removed because it was a carbon copy of my model. Nothing was changed at all. You even used my photos.
And as far as how popular your profile was on my model (which is private now, not deleted), Let’s take a look…
That’s right, 0 downloads.
EDIT: I’d like to add that my licenses were changed because of people like you.
lol you are just claiming it again here that you did changed the license again … its all good man your not alowed to do so so I guess meaby one day the mods will see this and remove it off your site. as you cannot revoke these freedoms wich you did. thank you
yeah probably got jealous or mad fo us remixing his model. its all good the mods admins will probably see this one day and retake considerations. as you are not allowed to revoke these freedoms and change licensing as you want. to him a remix of a kit card was not good enough, he still thinks kit cards are just adding support to the model but I dont think its just that as if it was just supports in the slicer it wouldnt take me 1hour to remake the model in solidworks and place all the parts nicely to make the kit card. in any way the models where under a specific license wich then got removed off my published models as he did changed the licensing and revoke his freedoms to then make a report on my models. Thanks a lot !