Suggestion: Could we not try to motivate the makers themselves to remove projects from Makerworld that garner little interest from the general public, instead of considering bans or exclusion? We could calculate a metric for every maker that determines the number of all downloads over all projects of time (e.g., 6 months) across all their submitted projects, and divide this download number by the number of existing submitted projects. If a maker submits 1000 projects that find little interest among the general public, their score will continually worsen. If they remove the projects from Makerworld that garner little interest, their score will gradually improve, since the current period is always taken into account. This way, every maker has control. Whether the assessment period is the last 3 months, 6 months, or a year, is a discussion in detail, as we must also consider that there are seasonal projects (e.g., holders for swimwear).