Dude, don’t lay this at Bambus feet. Own your screw up and learn from it.
Ask yourself, how many others have had a cluckup like this? How many others have had the front panel and wifi antenna bite it like this?
Really burns my biscuits to have someone have a small issue (adhesion) that they turn into an indictment of the company. Why is it so hard to own your own mistakes?
Oh, I didn’t tighten my lug nuts when I changed the tire, thanks Toyota for selling me junk.
I didn’t put water in the coffee maker, thanks Maxwell House.
I feel like I am in the middle of the “who’s on first skit” from Abbot and Costello.
Why did you have to order a new front panel when the product clearly shipped with a perfectly good front panel – and once again – why was it necessary to remove the panel to service the nozzle in the first place?
I have to ask an obvious question here and I’m not trying to be a jerk. Is English your first language? Are you just trying to be a troll? If not, then we can certainly cut you a lot of slack but you started a thread with a whole lot of hyperbole and laying blame on something that now is becoming crystal clear was operator error.
There’s a reason that Bambu’s Trustpilot has such pitiful reviews. I will get my P1S repaired and then sell it. The money I get back from selling that printer will be put to buying a Prusa MK4S. End of story.
Why were you running in Ludicrous mode? I’m betting that has a lot to do with what happened. Then you got ham fisted thinking you knew better and ripped the front trying to “repair” it. I guess going in from the top, or lowering the build plate was too easy.
This is, and I say this with 100% confidence, ALL your doing and no fault with the printer at all. Be sure to share that with Support.
Then why post the pic? We weren’t asking for old pics.
You post several pics of the same print, and I doubt seriously it is the only one using ludicrous.
You still have not explained the front panel. There is no senario that the cover is affected by a print failure. The print head cannot even touch the panel. The antenna is taped with double sided tape to the inside of the panel. You have to pull the panel approx 2inches out to take the slack out. The force required would not be generated by the printhead because it cannot transfer that force.
I’d like you to admit you did this. You won’t, but you should. You caused that havoc, you know you did, we know you did, and I’m certain @Support will know you did.
[quote=“Nebur, post:51, topic:100394”]
This is moving from funny nonsense into the creepy obsessed domain…
[/quote] Forgive me for calling out someone.
You guys are hilarious. Like I have never seen such an embodiment of rubber necking on a forum. Not just the rubber necking, but y’all are crossing the police line and starting your own investigations. Poor OP there with whiplash just trying to collect their thoughts still.
I’m coming from the Prusa community and it’s products. They are well made, like the Bambu, but user error will be user error no matter the manufacturer of the printer. Bambu seems to have made a great printer and the AMS system is leaps and bounds better than what Prusa have done with their few iterations of their MMS.
Also, you will find the Prusa community is great at helping people that actually need it figuring out something. They however do not do well when people just blame the the company for their negligence and flame the brand for no reason.
You already have a great printer. Why sell it losing money and then spend more money for the Prusa where you don’t get anything really better? Give it some time after you get your printer going again before making a hasty decision you might regret. Sometimes we get upset and aren’t thinking clearly.
The grass isn’t always greener…
