SquidMan
Ohh Man, why do you wrote more even then me? 
Before going through your points, I want to add that I feel the misnomer of “engineering materials” is the dumbest thing in all of 3DP marketing right now.
Agree!
You’re not printing real PEEK on any commercially available printer. As far as PPA, you could probably do it on the X2D if you slow it down and run it at max temp and sure, PPS you can’t print on it. But you’re also unlikely to be looking at PPS (€134/750g spool from BBL) as a beginner/casual 3D printer so why even bother with it as a marketing point. The X2D can and will print most filaments besides some exotic high temp materials, which if you’re actively printing with those either for a product or as a manufacturer, you’re already unlikely to be using Bambu machines due to certification issues.
Ok, X2D is not beginner casual 3D printer, this is a A1. 
X2D is exactly one step before the top in the BL line - H2. Maybe in the future there will be something more in between, today there is nothing.
I have no issues with the price of the filaments! And I am looking exactly at the top tier materials because of the higher HDT. And I do not need to print them in KGs. For example for propellers, flanges, and some adapters. Also some tooth wheels and similar mechanical parts. I am not manufacturer.
Now how real is PEEK or not this is other story. And I am not arguing anywhere if X2D can print or not. It prints, if it is not broken it prints.
I don’t think you have any real world basis for this. The fact that it’s on a rail doesn’t necessarily make it more precise. They both have the capacity for the vision encoder plate, both have the PMSM extruder motor so extrusion and motion accuracy would be expected to be the same on either machine. Raw speed and acceleration, okay, on paper the H2S can go 30% faster than an X1C printing PLA with specific settings but ultimately, you max speeds will be dictated on so many variables that the variable becomes a moot point.
I can agree on that! But you can see it is faster even in Bambu Studio when you slice it with given profile. Most of the time you have the time for the print listed in makerworld model page. And this time usually is faster then what I get in the slicer for X2D. Which makes me think it is in general 10-20% slower than X1/A1/P1/P2. Which can be normal as the head with the 2x nozzles most probably is heavier. Or for whatever other reason.
And BTW after I experienced this “speed” variations, especially with complex models, I have calculated that multiple A1 printers without any AMS-es are much better investment , than 1x X2D with AMS, FOR PLA/PETG/TPU prints. Not for ASA/ABS/PA/etc.
Can’t argue with that. But if you have limited space, need for printing huge things or just don’t have the budget, this factor goes away pretty quickly.
No one can argue with the volume, this is right - no replacement for displacement !
Also no one can argue with the budged!
Yes, the LAN port was big misunderstanding on my side, and made me even more sad… 
For the power supply I know that you can use not original but 4A with 24V is not small power supply and it will create even more mess. + why do you need redundancy for unit that you can not use if the main unit is out? Anyway I also said it can dry, but even if you have 1x FAN running you need to wait, until it stop. And as explained many times in other topics the benefit of drying while printing could be that you are preparing for the next print. As drying is not instant or fast. So you really need to go into accessories game, which could easily could burn every budged!
In addition Bambu’s own PLA and PETG support filament need high temp to be dried and can not be dried in the AMS 2 PRO! So you need separate drier only for the support material.
Fair, but swiss army knife machines aren’t ever a good solution. You’re better off buying an X2D and a dedicated laser engraver than cleaning your rails from soot after every use.
Agree, I would like to have H2S/H2D without this “options” which most probably burn budged for development and quality features. And not sure why X2D does not exactly the same specs, at it has basically the same HW, just smaller. So we see market segmentation in play here, which is ugly.
This is really a thing so many people don’t get, it’s fascinating. We want our machines to move. By transferring the vibrations into the frame, you’re avoiding them being transferred into the part that you’re printing. It works in tandem with input shaping to prevent ghosting and ringing from appearing on sudden directional changes because the movement moves into the frame and dissipates there.
Sorry but no . If you swing the whole box, you also swing the plate and the detail that you print! You are constantly accelerating and stopping it. And it should move only on Z dimension. If you have stable frame, nothing, NOTHING will swing or vibrate. With this swinging we have ALL swinging exactly as bed slinger. But now in 3x dimensions.
This is why lathes and CNC are heavy as heavy!
Now they made it swing most probably because the frame is not sturdy enough, so they transfer inertia to the whole box, so the frame will swing and not brake. And this is a cheap design, not good design!
The same for the melting side panel, more or less this is a bad design.
PTFE cramped - Sure. This is probably your most valid point.
Yes I can see the traces left on the top lid from it, so no need to be kind of genius to see this. Also it does not really good when you see it cramped like this. It again looks bad design/cheap!
I don’t think this is true? X2D also has flap and two air curtain ls for cooling in addition to the hotend cooler?
I do not see such flap in X2D. And this is why BL recommend to open the lid when you print PLA. Please correct me if I am wrong!
From how I see it X2D get cool air from the bottom - dust sucking device - the exhaust from the middle which most of the time for small models is under the plate ……… yet another design nonsense.
It really isn’t though man. Is it a little bit more to think about when you’re preparing your print, absolutely. Is it unlikely that you’ll be able to load a Bambu handy auto-generated profile and have it print perfect? Yes, because they’re set up to single nozzle supports, so you have to do a little bit of work. But no way with the finish that you get on a dissimilar support print would you be able to achieve that on any machine with one nozzle. And AMS PLA/PETG swapping leads to huge purge and cross contamination.
I told you already but let me repeat, I do not use handy app for printing, only for monitoring! I can not imagine what is happening with the people which try to use X2D with the handy app direcltly
Now nothing is easy with the AUX( ok maybe only PLA), and it require a lot of experience to know what support where to put, then AUX to be able to print it. Then Success! It is like 100x easier with similar material, or support but with main nozzle, of course in this case you get lots of waste.
My AUX with PETG for support was able to fail even on the prime tower . This is how just a bit more thinking is required . And PETG as support material failed in all possible ways with all kind of models.
This model would not have been possible to print with regular supports to the same spec. (ABS/PETG)
I am not commenting at all ABS and ASA!
Ultimately, at the price point, the X2D still is the king of dissimilar support, and higher temp filaments (excluding exotics). There straight up is nothing on the market right now that compares to it and as I mentioned in the primary post, if this is not a need for you (it was for me) then the P2S is a perfect machine if you’re shopping on a certain set budget.
X2D is king of anything , it is more like jack of all, master of none! BUT it can be used like this. Then what did you said at the end is exactly what I mean, actually P2S will be better for all else, but the price, the specs, the reviews, the marketing cry get X2D! And people sell their old printers, bought in the feature wagon, and then comes the sadness.
JamboBambu
Then I’m try print Bambu panda with white PLA on main nozzle and black PLA on aux nozzle. There are some artifacts but I think that it look ok, compared to what I see on forums where users post a lot of worse prints of that panda 
. But one material for both of them is very good idea.
