It’s also against Makerworld rules and illegal in the US.
3 Likes
Good for you, but it doesn’t matter as it’s prohibited by MakerWorld Terms of Service/Community Guidelines. It also prohibits usage of the platform by individuals under the age of thirteen, so hopefully you aren’t in that category as well.
1 Like
Yes you are and Rando 101 is not fake
4 Likes
Ya you are 14 year old Rando 101
Interesting that a child is calling me childish. And if Rando101 was 14 which he said he’s not, you probably shouldn’t post that online.
Oh you said your 14 year old Rando 101
Which part? The makerworld rules or the law? It’s explicitly stated in Makerworld rules that you can’t have contests. The law is easy to find with Google… here I’ll help you:
For the Makerworld rules you can lose your points and/or get banned. For the law you can be arrested or sued.
Most people would take this thread as a heads up and stop doing it… but I guess posting here and proudly addmitting what you’ve been doing is another option. You see your one friend deleted his posts and said he didn’t want to get involved… wonder why?
7 Likes
Do you mean User game ???
No. He means ANY giveaway run on MakerWorld.
1 Like
Sorry I didn’t know you couldn’t trade boost
I won’t do it again
3 Likes
If you just use big words in your argument, then that should sufficiently confuse them enough that they can’t fight back other than calling you a “Karen” or “Cyber bully”
3 Likes
After thoroughly considering the various aspects, nuances, and implications of the statement that has been presented before me, and after carefully evaluating its logical consistency, factual accuracy, and overall coherence within the broader context of our discussion, I find myself compelled, with no significant reservations or objections, to wholeheartedly align my perspective, viewpoint, and general disposition with the sentiment that has been expressed, thereby affirming, acknowledging, and fully endorsing the proposition in question without hesitation or reluctance.
—ChatGPT
10 Likes
After engaging in an extensive, meticulous, and profoundly introspective analysis of the multifaceted discourse unfolding before us, carefully parsing each lexical nuance and rhetorical flourish while rigorously cross-referencing against a vast mental archive of comparable online interactions, I find myself inexorably drawn to the inescapable conclusion that the aforementioned assertion—despite its somewhat reductive and overly generalized nature—contains within it a kernel of undeniable, if not entirely palatable, truth. Nevertheless, I must, with great scholarly enthusiasm, counterbalance such a claim by postulating that the inclination to resort to such characterizations may, in fact, be symptomatic of an underlying deficiency in substantive rebuttal, thus rendering said assertion less a matter of objective classification and more a reflection of the claimant’s own rhetorical limitations. In short, while I respect the energy and effort behind the sentiment, I am obliged to dismiss it with the same amused detachment one might reserve for a particularly persistent yet ultimately inconsequential fly.
-ChatGPT
6 Likes
rando 101 juest use https://makerworld.com.cn/zh and google translate
You’ve got a Chinese phone number, which is required to make an account? Then go right ahead (though it’d still be breaking MW China rules if they’re similar to Global ones)
use wechat i use it a lot
or use apple to log in i have a Chinese phone number
After taking into account the statement you have put forth and considering its implications in a broader context, I acknowledge your perspective and recognize that you have chosen a particular course of action or viewpoint that aligns with your own values, priorities, or strategic inclinations. However, upon careful reflection and in accordance with my own principles, ethical considerations, and personal assessment of what constitutes meaningful, responsible, and constructive engagement within any given platform, I must express that I do not, under any circumstances, find it to be a justifiable, productive, or morally sound practice to engage in the dissemination of content that could be categorized as spam or otherwise low-value material, irrespective of geographic location, audience composition, or the specific digital ecosystem in question.
—ChatGPT
2 Likes
no chatgpt pls Zammer3d 
Due to the fact that I possess neither the inclination nor the requisite level of patience to allocate a non-negligible fraction of my finite temporal resources toward an endeavor that, upon thorough cost-benefit analysis, appears to yield no discernible intellectual, emotional, or pragmatic return on investment, I must regrettably decline to engage in such an exercise in futility. Consequently, let this statement stand as the unequivocal, final, and irrevocable conclusion of my participation in this discourse, beyond which no further commentary, elaboration, or engagement shall be forthcoming from my end.
5 Likes