As the subject states, when adding CyberBrick models, designers can’t categorise their design appropriately.
Users looking for CyberBrick models must hope the tags will work and that designers have used the correct format (no space).
There are insufficient model categories, they are rarely appended. In this example, it behoves @MakerWorld @BambuLab to make this addition expeditiously.
As we add our models, we lose this opportunity to publicise our models and the CyberBrick product range.
It’s been fun seeing the plethora of random items tagged “Cyberbrick” in the last few days
Luckily (I guess?), the process to approve a cyberbrick model is a lot stricter than just putting a tag in the listing and calling it a day
Also the app (iOS) has only approved cyberbrick projects, a good way to weed out the stuff that isn’t related
The process to upload CyberBrick models hasn’t been rolled out to everyone.
The new extra question is just not available for many, me included.
The whole rollout has been difficult and convoluted. No date for any stage has been achieved.
I have the review model. It is incompatible with the new mobile and desktop app and the config files it generates do not work for the new version.
It appears there were changes to it, the communication model swapped from WiFi initially to using BlueTooth now.
Some have been offered firmware upgrades, others, including me, have not.