I am having trouble getting an acceptable surface where the support touches. Are there any recommended settings I can use to make it look better?
I have also noticed crappy layers where the support touches…interesting
1 Like
What are the settings are you using? If possible, would you provide a 3mf project?
I have only tried the preset settings for the different types of auto support >normal<,>tree<,>hybrid<. There was no difference. Obviously, there a many other settings parameters but not sure where to start.
1 Like
I dont get those overhangs… have you tried Normal(auto) ?
I have had the same result on normal(auto). Pretty much any overhang past like 75 degrees looks like â– â– â– â– underneath
1 Like
Shoot me an email and ill send ya the 3 mf that i painted and got crappy layers where supports were. Munchers2010@gmail.com
just put it in dropbox or google drive and leave the link
I also have those ugly surfaces. I also tried bambo support filament, but it seems so, that the support itself is not the problem. It’s more like a bad first layer after the support end.
I also tried rafting with a simple cube. Same problem.
1 Like
I dont use those apps.
You have a gmail, so you have a Google drive
1 Like
Having the same issues. Very bad surface quality on supported surfaces compared to previous printer with same project and same filaments. Round holes become polygons and there is poor adhesion to support interface. I think that the interface settings need to be tuned and the bridge infill and bridges need to be slowed way down.
1 Like
touche…lets say i dont really use it haha …i can figure it out
in my experience with Bambu, regular bridges, unsupported, bridge quite well. When they are above supports and it needs to bridge between the supports interface it behaves differently and doesn’t actually bridge. So the underside of supported horizontal overhangs look droopy and incoherent, but the underside of unsupported bridges look fine.
No Solution for this Problem?
1 Like
You can try “Honeycomb” as base pattern for support. Maybe this gives a nicer surface.
1 Like
Not that I have seen. I just re-printed 2 jobs yesterday because supported surfaces were so, so bad. I have found tree support to be the worst offender, and like others have mentioned letting the printer bridge works in a lot of situations because it is so good at it.
I think some work needs to go into Bambu Studio on the support behavior - maybe borrow from Cura where they work fine for me on my other printer.
1 Like
The supported surfaces are looking realy terrible…never seen so bad surfaces - like forgetting support while printing in the air…the picture in post 1 is good against this…
all other things are printed perfect!!!
3 Likes
One thing I have seen with the slicer is the bridge and overhang speeds will not be correct for some parts you will have to use classic mode or change your speed settings look at your speeds in the drop down menu also the bambu lab printer is using higher nozzle temp than say your older 3d printer so this is effecting it also when speeds are off.
Now @ slicer so I did some sample photos of what you can see in speeds with just some changes.
Classic Mode
Top Z Distance .01 or more
Top Z Distance 0
Overgang Speed 75% 100% set @ 30 mm/s from 10 mm/s
1 Like