Moving around that much with the fan at 100% would help cool the print 
Also engage the door lock.
2 Likes
That’s a cool one:
a user printed my kit card rubberband copter which requires a rubber band and a drop of oil (clearly stated in the description) and gave only 3 stars because this model needs a rubberband and the oil.
That genuinely made me laugh out loud.
I hope you reported it for misinformation.
Could have been worse, they could have complained they needed to provide filament and electricity !!
If I’m reading that correctly, he is annoyed someone was punished so he is paying that punishment forwards?
What a world we live in.
3 Likes
thought this one was funny:
all three from the same person, no idea what’s compelled them to write this but at least it was interesting!
5 Likes
Like a lot of users here, I have received my share of ratings/comments that just didn’t make sense. One in particular had me clicking on their username, on my way to block them from being able to rate any of my other models when I saw this in their profile.
What Bambu Labs have done for the 3d printing community is absolutely incredible. They turned 3d printers into toasters. Appliances that anyone can use, all you need is an app. So everyone bought their kids printers and a lot of these rating/comment issues are a result of this youth movement within the community, in my opinion. I realized that I can’t be mad at that.
Ratings are useless anyway. If I see a model I like, I skip right to the comments and look for user uploaded photos of their prints. Those are the reviews that matter to me.
Ideally, I’d like to see Bambu shift the point incentive from rating models to uploading “makes”.
7 Likes
Yeah not sure about some of these reviews, at the very least I’m going to need more coffee and time to review comments in the morning 
They can’t rate more than 3 starts even despite print succeeding when there was some error eg AMS got stuck retracting filament or something like that. In that case app counts that as failure and limits rating to 3stars max.
it’s the same if there’s some fail at the start of the print, user fixes the issue and re-starts print from printer itself. It still gets limited to 3 stars max.
I’ve talked with one person who liked my models and did rate things 5 stars and as it turns out when such situation happens the user can’t even fix the rating via website. The only 'fix" there is to remove the rating (in my case the person removed the rating out of their own volition).
(obviously user can re-print from handy or studio, but who would want to print another one of the thing they already have?)
This is what I don’t understand. If I have a print “fail” but it’s not the prints fault, I’ll just not rate it if 3 stars was my only option. Better to not rate than rate a good model with only 3 stars, right? Or am I missing something?
People don’t understand that rating 3 stars is harmful for a model (especially those who just print and do not design their own models). They don’t know how rating translates into points, or they don’t care. Maybe they think that 3 stars is better than nothing. Maybe the system reminds them that they should rate…
On top of what @Crow_ck said - maybe also point incentive? I mean - there’s up to 10 points per rating
My current strategy would be to simply ask the user quite politely to remove the rating if the rating’s obviously limited by the app.
Schrödinger’s profile rating - a fantastic print that simultaneously didn’t completely print fantastically 
2 Likes
3 Likes
Eh, they will never learn… I hope you reported it.
It’s a fidget. Scaling it down decreases the tolerance and makes it not work. Reported, hopefully they remove it.
2 Likes
I had the identical thing on a Fidget Spinner.
Those gaps are designed precisely to make the thing work. If the gaps get smaller, then, it becomes a lump of plastic, who doesn’t realise that before they go medally?
These aren’t ornaments they have mechanical properties.
Scaling isn’t a shrink ray that also adjusts the atoms as it does in TV or films.
2 Likes